Re: RFC: Factory review policy change regarding multi-specfile packages
Frederic Crozat writes:
Le mardi 25 avril 2023 =E0 13:42 +0200, Marcus R=FCckert a =E9crit=A0:
1. not sure that using the same element for multiple build descriptions and flavors within a build description is a good idea =20 This is wanted, according to Adrian (see https://github.com/openSUSE/open-build-service/issues/8847#issuecomment-= 570156830 where package xml tag is considered obsolete)
This discussion attempts to address exactly the problem pointed out by Darix. Unfortunately, the only answer I can deduce from the discussion there is that one may have *either* multiple spec files *or* meaningful build flavors (ie replacements for @BUILD_FLAVOR@). Since replacing @BUILD_FLAVOR@ by the spec file name does not allow for a useful disctinction between different 'flavors' inside the spec file. Is this really the goal here - in the hope to avoid extending the semantics (as Stefan Br=FCns has proposed in an earlier response)? Cheers, Egbert.
participants (1)
-
Egbert Eich