On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 4:38 PM Brüns, Stefan wrote:

On Montag, 4. März 2019 22:26:18 CET Todd Rme wrote:

...

It looks like the build results in the OSC web interface are not displaying requires specified in the spec file, only automatically-detected results.

For example, with alsa, it Requires: alsa-utils. But if you look at the build results, that requirement is not listed:

https://build.opensuse.org/build/openSUSE:Factory/standard/x86_64/alsa/_log

This happens in every projects, package, and build target I have checked. I am not sure if this is a bug or expected behavior, though.

It definitely is: https://build.opensuse.org/package/binary/openSUSE:Factory/alsa/standard/ x86_64/alsa-1.1.8-1.1.x86_64.rpm

Regards,

Stefan

It is listed there, but not in the build log that I linked to. Here is the full list from the log: Provides: alsa = 1.1.8-1.1 alsa(x86-64) = 1.1.8-1.1 Requires(interp): /bin/sh Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Requires(post): /bin/sh coreutils diffutils fillup grep Requires: /bin/bash /bin/sh Recommends: alsa-oss alsa-plugins Recommends, suggests, supplements, etc. are all listed in build logs, as are automatically-generated requires. Only manually-specified requires seem to be missing. In fact as far as I can find "alsa-utils" doesn't appear anywhere in the build log at all. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org

If this is expected behavior, that is fine. I wasn't sure. On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 2:27 AM Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:

On Tue, 2019-03-05 at 09:37 -0500, Todd Rme wrote:

...

On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 4:38 PM Brüns, Stefan wrote:

...

On Montag, 4. März 2019 22:26:18 CET Todd Rme wrote:

...

It looks like the build results in the OSC web interface are not displaying requires specified in the spec file, only automatically-detected results.

For example, with alsa, it Requires: alsa-utils. But if you look at the build results, that requirement is not listed:

https://build.opensuse.org/build/openSUSE:Factory/standard/x86_64/alsa/_log

This happens in every projects, package, and build target I have checked. I am not sure if this is a bug or expected behavior, though.

It definitely is: https://build.opensuse.org/package/binary/openSUSE:Factory/alsa/standard/ x86_64/alsa-1.1.8-1.1.x86_64.rpm

Regards,

Stefan

It is listed there, but not in the build log that I linked to. Here is the full list from the log:

Provides: alsa = 1.1.8-1.1 alsa(x86-64) = 1.1.8-1.1 Requires(interp): /bin/sh Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Requires(post): /bin/sh coreutils diffutils fillup grep Requires: /bin/bash /bin/sh Recommends: alsa-oss alsa-plugins

Recommends, suggests, supplements, etc. are all listed in build logs, as are automatically-generated requires. Only manually-specified requires seem to be missing. In fact as far as I can find "alsa-utils" doesn't appear anywhere in the build log at all.

Why would you expect it to be listed? ALL of the log is the output of various commands running, the requires/recommends list from the auto- dep generators. As there is no generator involved for the manually defined requires, there is nothing outputting them into the log.

Cheers Dominique

-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org