[opensuse-packaging] Failing patch (only) for SLE_10
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/e76779f0629280df6d2dfce07e4e1600.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hello, I have a very interesting problem - a patch that works for most build targets fails for SLE_10. Does someone have an idea what could cause this (IMHO strange) behaviour? I've seen this in server:php:applications / postfixadmin https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=postfixadmin&project=server:... Regards, Christian Boltz --
Ist doch laut Deinen Schilderungen von den Hardwareanforderungen her eine perfekte Konkurrenz zu Vista *renn* ;-) Da hast du recht ! Aber warum rennen :-) es wird dir kaum jemand hinterherlaufen weil alle vor der Kiste sitzen um auf die Katalogupdates zu warten ... [> Benjamin Zeller und Helmut Zengerling in suse-linux]
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/a0bd648d192e82b20bc7d2638ff08bd9.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Christian Boltz <opensuse@cboltz.de> wrote:
Hello,
I have a very interesting problem - a patch that works for most build targets fails for SLE_10. Does someone have an idea what could cause this (IMHO strange) behaviour?
I've seen this in server:php:applications / postfixadmin https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=postfixadmin&project=server:...
Why don't you cat the .rej file to find out why it fails? It most likely is a patch that was based on an earlier/different source tree. It could probably fail due to a different patch version that fails to merge it to the current source. It should be fixed by rebasing the patch on the current source. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/166a9dc7f6dfa03336c0ed1ccf2d892d.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
* V Středa 8. únor 2012, 20:38:12 [CET] Claudio Freire napsal:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Christian Boltz <opensuse@cboltz.de> wrote:
Hello,
I have a very interesting problem - a patch that works for most build targets fails for SLE_10. Does someone have an idea what could cause this (IMHO strange) behaviour?
I've seen this in server:php:applications / postfixadmin https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=postfixadmin&project=server:...
Why don't you cat the .rej file to find out why it fails?
It most likely is a patch that was based on an earlier/different source tree. It could probably fail due to a different patch version that fails to merge it to the current source. It should be fixed by rebasing the patch on the current source.
Packages for SLE_10 are built with fuzz=0, so the patches must be more accurate to succeed. As Claudio suggests, refresh your patch. -- Vita Cizek
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/cb2aaf49f775c94d4056311eef22be7b.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 09.02.2012 11:02, Vitezslav Cizek wrote:
Packages for SLE_10 are built with fuzz=0, so the patches must be more accurate to succeed.
As Claudio suggests, refresh your patch.
This is true for >= 11.4 too, but I guess the sle10 patch is more buggy Greetings,Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/166a9dc7f6dfa03336c0ed1ccf2d892d.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
* V Čtvrtek 9. únor 2012, 11:04:39 [CET] Stephan Kulow napsal:
On 09.02.2012 11:02, Vitezslav Cizek wrote:
Packages for SLE_10 are built with fuzz=0, so the patches must be more accurate to succeed.
As Claudio suggests, refresh your patch.
This is true for >= 11.4 too, but I guess the sle10 patch is more buggy
Indeed it seems so. Anyway, refreshing the patch fixes the build failure. -- Vita Cizek
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/e76779f0629280df6d2dfce07e4e1600.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hello, Am Donnerstag, 9. Februar 2012 schrieb Stephan Kulow:
On 09.02.2012 11:02, Vitezslav Cizek wrote:
Packages for SLE_10 are built with fuzz=0, so the patches must be more accurate to succeed.
As Claudio suggests, refresh your patch.
This is true for >= 11.4 too, but I guess the sle10 patch is more buggy
I think you are correct with the "more buggy" part ;-) (You are lucky that I don't have permissions to report SLE10 bugs *g*) The problem was that my patch had less context lines than usual, and for some reason patch didn't like that... Refreshing the patch solved the issue. Regards, Christian Boltz --
You say our final product doesn't have bugs worth tracking? No. Your final products are in general known for their bugginess. This could be a marketing decision to assure your jobs. ;-)) [> Stephan Kulow and Eberhard Mönkeberg in opensuse-factory]
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org
participants (4)
-
Christian Boltz
-
Claudio Freire
-
Stephan Kulow
-
Vitezslav Cizek