Hi, If the source package include a library that is not built and not part of the binary, should it then be mentioned in the license line in the spec? This is specifically about musescore, which contain google crash client, but we disable it during build. It is the only part with an apache license. Thanks, Cor
On Friday 2023-03-10 23:36, Cor Blom wrote:
If the source package include a library that is not built and not part of the binary, should it then be mentioned in the license line in the spec?
The first License: line of the spec file also gets applied into the SRPM - so that is the one where you would want to specify all included licenses.
On Freitag, 10. März 2023 23:44:42 CET Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Friday 2023-03-10 23:36, Cor Blom wrote: licenses.
If the source package include a library that is not built and not part of the binary, should it then be mentioned in the license line in the spec? The first License: line of the spec file also gets applied into the SRPM
- so that is the one where you would want to specify all included
Since RPM 4.18 there also is the SourceLicense tag, see https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/rpm-4.18.0-release/docs/ manual/spec.md#sourcelicense So you can use something like: ``` %if 0%{?suse_version} >= 1599 SourceLicense: GPL-2.0-or-later AND Apache-2.0 License: GPL-2.0-or-later %else License: GPL-2.0-or-later AND Apache-2.0 %endif ``` Regards, Stefan -- Stefan Brüns / Bergstraße 21 / 52062 Aachen phone: +49 241 53809034 mobile: +49 151 50412019
participants (3)
-
Cor Blom -
Jan Engelhardt -
Stefan Brüns