[opensuse-packaging] RPMLINT: Badness exceeds threshold - unsure why
I'm not sure what needs to be done to reduce the badness of this package. Maybe I'm just not seeing something, or maybe I have failed to grasp some concept, or maybe *shrug*... Anything to set me on the path to success would be greatly appreciated! ------ cut ------ Preparing packages for installation... gelide-0.1.5.git20111210-13.1 ... running 01-check-debuginfo ... testing for empty debuginfo packages ... running 02-check-gcc-output ... testing for serious compiler warnings (using /usr/lib/build/checks-data/check_gcc_output) (using //.build.log) ... running 03-check-binary-kernel-log ... running 04-check-filelist ... checking filelist ... running 05-check-invalid-requires ... running 06-check-installtest ... testing for pre/postinstall scripts that are not idempotent ... running 08-check-permissions ... testing for modified permissions ... running 09-check-packaged-twice ... running 10-check-lanana ... running 12-check-libtool-deps ... testing devel dependencies required by libtool .la files (can be skipped by "skip-check-libtool-deps" anywhere in spec) ... running 13-check-invalid-provides ... running 14-check-gconf-scriptlets ... testing GConf scriptlet presence ... running 99-check-remove-rpms ... removing all built rpms (order: reverse gelide) RPMLINT report: =============== (none): E: badness 30100 exceeds threshold 1000, aborting. [ 385.000533] SysRq : Power Off [ 386.558475] Power down. ----- cut ----- https://build.opensuse.org/package/rawlog?arch=x86_64&package=gelide&project=home%3Acanislycan%3Aemulators&repository=openSUSE_12.1 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org
On 12/15/2011 05:29 PM, David Lemke wrote:
I'm not sure what needs to be done to reduce the badness of this package. Maybe I'm just not seeing something, or maybe I have failed to grasp some concept, or maybe *shrug*...
Anything to set me on the path to success would be greatly appreciated!
------ cut ------ Preparing packages for installation... gelide-0.1.5.git20111210-13.1 ... running 01-check-debuginfo ... testing for empty debuginfo packages ... running 02-check-gcc-output ... testing for serious compiler warnings (using /usr/lib/build/checks-data/check_gcc_output) (using //.build.log) ... running 03-check-binary-kernel-log ... running 04-check-filelist ... checking filelist ... running 05-check-invalid-requires ... running 06-check-installtest ... testing for pre/postinstall scripts that are not idempotent ... running 08-check-permissions ... testing for modified permissions ... running 09-check-packaged-twice ... running 10-check-lanana ... running 12-check-libtool-deps ... testing devel dependencies required by libtool .la files (can be skipped by "skip-check-libtool-deps" anywhere in spec) ... running 13-check-invalid-provides ... running 14-check-gconf-scriptlets ... testing GConf scriptlet presence ... running 99-check-remove-rpms ... removing all built rpms (order: reverse gelide)
RPMLINT report: =============== (none): E: badness 30100 exceeds threshold 1000, aborting. [ 385.000533] SysRq : Power Off [ 386.558475] Power down. ----- cut -----
Looks to me like a bug in rpmlint. HTH, Peter -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org
Hello David, bellow you can find results from local build, anyway I have fixed almost all warnings inside package and .spec file and have submited request to you, so just review changes and and accept or decline :) RPMLINT report: =============== (none): E: badness 30100 exceeds threshold 1000, aborting. gelide.x86_64: W: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES gelide.x86_64: W: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES gelide.x86_64: W: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES gelide.x86_64: W: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/locale/es_ES/LC_MESSAGES gelide.x86_64: W: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES gelide.x86_64: W: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/locale/fr_FR/LC_MESSAGES gelide.x86_64: W: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES gelide.x86_64: W: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES This package owns a directory that is part of the standard hierarchy, which can lead to default directory permissions or ownerships being changed to something non-standard. gelide.x86_64: W: not-listed-as-documentation /usr/share/gnome/help/gelide/C/legal.xml gelide.x86_64: W: not-listed-as-documentation /usr/share/gnome/help/gelide/C/figures/imag0.png gelide.x86_64: W: not-listed-as-documentation /usr/share/gnome/help/gelide/C/gelide.xml The documentation files of this package are not listed with the standard %doc tag. gelide.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Games/Emulators gelide.src: W: non-standard-group Games/Emulators The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games/3D/Other", "Amusements/Games/3D/Race", ...snip... A LOT OF RPM GRUPS.... ...snip... gelide.x86_64: W: no-changelogname-tag gelide.src: W: no-changelogname-tag There is no changelog. Please insert a '%changelog' section heading in your spec file and prepare your changes file using e.g. the 'osc vc' command. gelide.x86_64: W: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/gelide.desktop value "" for key "Version" in group "Desktop Entry" is not a known version .desktop file is not valid, check with desktop-file-validate gelide.x86_64: W: install-file-in-docs /usr/share/doc/packages/gelide/INSTALL A file whose name suggests that it contains installation instructions is included in the package. Such instructions are often not relevant for already installed packages; if this is the case for this file and it does not contain any information that is of interest after the package has been built and installed, do not include the file in the binary package. gelide.x86_64: E: files-duplicated-waste (Badness: 100) 891748 Your package contains duplicated files that are not hard- or symlinks. You should use the %fdupes macro to link the files to one. gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/pt_BR/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/pt_BR/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/it/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/it/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/vi/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/vi/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/ro/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/ro/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/hu/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/hu/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/kn/scrollkeeper_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/kn/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/sr/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/sr/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/no/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/no/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/sr@Latn/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/sr@Latn/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/sk/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/sk/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/nl/scrollkeeper_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/nl/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/ko/scrollkeeper_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/ko/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/de/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/de/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/ca/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/ca/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/es/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/es/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/fr/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/fr/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/zh_TW/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/zh_TW/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/sv/scrollkeeper_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/sv/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/pl/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/pl/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/am/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/am/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/cs/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/cs/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/uk/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/az/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml:/var/lib/scrollkeeper/az/scrollkeeper_cl.xml:/var/lib/scrollkeeper/uk/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/be/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/be/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/zh_CN/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/zh_CN/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/ja/scrollkeeper_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/ja/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/tr/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/tr/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/el/scrollkeeper_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/el/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/C/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/C/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/sl/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/sl/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/ru/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/ru/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/da/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/da/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/gelide.mo gelide.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/gelide.mo gelide.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/es_ES/LC_MESSAGES/gelide.mo gelide.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/fr_FR/LC_MESSAGES/gelide.mo gelide.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/gelide.mo gelide.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/gelide.mo gelide.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/gelide.mo gelide.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/gelide.mo gelide.x86_64: E: file-contains-buildroot (Badness: 10000) /var/lib/scrollkeeper/scrollkeeper_docs gelide.x86_64: E: file-contains-buildroot (Badness: 10000) /var/lib/scrollkeeper/C/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: E: file-contains-buildroot (Badness: 10000) /var/lib/scrollkeeper/C/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml Your file contains traces of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. gelide.x86_64: W: empty-%postun gelide.x86_64: W: empty-%post 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 58 warnings. The buildroot was: /srv/oscbuild/openSUSE_12.1-x86_64 steki@kuca:~/OSC/home:canislycan:emulators/gelide> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 2:29 AM, David Lemke <canislycan@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm not sure what needs to be done to reduce the badness of this package. Maybe I'm just not seeing something, or maybe I have failed to grasp some concept, or maybe *shrug*...
Anything to set me on the path to success would be greatly appreciated!
------ cut ------ Preparing packages for installation... gelide-0.1.5.git20111210-13.1 ... running 01-check-debuginfo ... testing for empty debuginfo packages ... running 02-check-gcc-output ... testing for serious compiler warnings (using /usr/lib/build/checks-data/check_gcc_output) (using //.build.log) ... running 03-check-binary-kernel-log ... running 04-check-filelist ... checking filelist ... running 05-check-invalid-requires ... running 06-check-installtest ... testing for pre/postinstall scripts that are not idempotent ... running 08-check-permissions ... testing for modified permissions ... running 09-check-packaged-twice ... running 10-check-lanana ... running 12-check-libtool-deps ... testing devel dependencies required by libtool .la files (can be skipped by "skip-check-libtool-deps" anywhere in spec) ... running 13-check-invalid-provides ... running 14-check-gconf-scriptlets ... testing GConf scriptlet presence ... running 99-check-remove-rpms ... removing all built rpms (order: reverse gelide)
RPMLINT report: =============== (none): E: badness 30100 exceeds threshold 1000, aborting. [ 385.000533] SysRq : Power Off [ 386.558475] Power down. ----- cut -----
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org
Oh wow I'm so excited! This is fantastic! I never expected this much help from anyone and am truly grateful! Boris, thank you for taking the time to help a novice like me! =D On Saturday, December 17, 2011 04:15:42 AM Boris Manojlovic wrote:
Hello David,
bellow you can find results from local build, anyway I have fixed almost all warnings inside package and .spec file and have submited request to you, so just review changes and and accept or decline :) RPMLINT report: =============== (none): E: badness 30100 exceeds threshold 1000, aborting. gelide.x86_64: W: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES gelide.x86_64: W: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES gelide.x86_64: W: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES gelide.x86_64: W: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/locale/es_ES/LC_MESSAGES gelide.x86_64: W: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES gelide.x86_64: W: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/locale/fr_FR/LC_MESSAGES gelide.x86_64: W: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES gelide.x86_64: W: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES This package owns a directory that is part of the standard hierarchy, which can lead to default directory permissions or ownerships being changed to something non-standard.
gelide.x86_64: W: not-listed-as-documentation /usr/share/gnome/help/gelide/C/legal.xml gelide.x86_64: W: not-listed-as-documentation /usr/share/gnome/help/gelide/C/figures/imag0.png gelide.x86_64: W: not-listed-as-documentation /usr/share/gnome/help/gelide/C/gelide.xml The documentation files of this package are not listed with the standard %doc tag.
gelide.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Games/Emulators gelide.src: W: non-standard-group Games/Emulators The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games/3D/Other", "Amusements/Games/3D/Race", ...snip... A LOT OF RPM GRUPS.... ...snip... gelide.x86_64: W: no-changelogname-tag gelide.src: W: no-changelogname-tag There is no changelog. Please insert a '%changelog' section heading in your spec file and prepare your changes file using e.g. the 'osc vc' command.
gelide.x86_64: W: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/gelide.desktop value "" for key "Version" in group "Desktop Entry" is not a known version .desktop file is not valid, check with desktop-file-validate
gelide.x86_64: W: install-file-in-docs /usr/share/doc/packages/gelide/INSTALL A file whose name suggests that it contains installation instructions is included in the package. Such instructions are often not relevant for already installed packages; if this is the case for this file and it does not contain any information that is of interest after the package has been built and installed, do not include the file in the binary package.
gelide.x86_64: E: files-duplicated-waste (Badness: 100) 891748 Your package contains duplicated files that are not hard- or symlinks. You should use the %fdupes macro to link the files to one.
gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/pt_BR/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/pt_BR/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/it/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/it/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/vi/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/vi/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/ro/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/ro/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/hu/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/hu/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/kn/scrollkeeper_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/kn/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/sr/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/sr/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/no/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/no/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/sr@Latn/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/sr@Latn/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/sk/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/sk/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/nl/scrollkeeper_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/nl/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/ko/scrollkeeper_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/ko/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/de/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/de/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/ca/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/ca/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/es/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/es/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/fr/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/fr/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/zh_TW/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/zh_TW/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/sv/scrollkeeper_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/sv/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/pl/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/pl/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/am/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/am/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/cs/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/cs/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/uk/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/az/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml:/var/lib/scrollkeeper/az/scrollkeeper_cl.xml:/var/lib/scrollkeeper/uk/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/be/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/be/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/zh_CN/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/zh_CN/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/ja/scrollkeeper_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/ja/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/tr/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/tr/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/el/scrollkeeper_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/el/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/C/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/C/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/sl/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/sl/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/ru/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/ru/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /var/lib/scrollkeeper/da/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml /var/lib/scrollkeeper/da/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/gelide.mo gelide.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/gelide.mo gelide.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/es_ES/LC_MESSAGES/gelide.mo gelide.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/fr_FR/LC_MESSAGES/gelide.mo gelide.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/gelide.mo gelide.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/gelide.mo gelide.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/gelide.mo gelide.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/gelide.mo gelide.x86_64: E: file-contains-buildroot (Badness: 10000) /var/lib/scrollkeeper/scrollkeeper_docs gelide.x86_64: E: file-contains-buildroot (Badness: 10000) /var/lib/scrollkeeper/C/scrollkeeper_cl.xml gelide.x86_64: E: file-contains-buildroot (Badness: 10000) /var/lib/scrollkeeper/C/scrollkeeper_extended_cl.xml Your file contains traces of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
gelide.x86_64: W: empty-%postun gelide.x86_64: W: empty-%post 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 58 warnings.
The buildroot was: /srv/oscbuild/openSUSE_12.1-x86_64 steki@kuca:~/OSC/home:canislycan:emulators/gelide>
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 2:29 AM, David Lemke <canislycan@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm not sure what needs to be done to reduce the badness of this package. Maybe I'm just not seeing something, or maybe I have failed to grasp some concept, or maybe *shrug*...
Anything to set me on the path to success would be greatly appreciated!
------ cut ------ Preparing packages for installation... gelide-0.1.5.git20111210-13.1 ... running 01-check-debuginfo ... testing for empty debuginfo packages ... running 02-check-gcc-output ... testing for serious compiler warnings (using /usr/lib/build/checks-data/check_gcc_output) (using //.build.log) ... running 03-check-binary-kernel-log ... running 04-check-filelist ... checking filelist ... running 05-check-invalid-requires ... running 06-check-installtest ... testing for pre/postinstall scripts that are not idempotent ... running 08-check-permissions ... testing for modified permissions ... running 09-check-packaged-twice ... running 10-check-lanana ... running 12-check-libtool-deps ... testing devel dependencies required by libtool .la files (can be skipped by "skip-check-libtool-deps" anywhere in spec) ... running 13-check-invalid-provides ... running 14-check-gconf-scriptlets ... testing GConf scriptlet presence ... running 99-check-remove-rpms ... removing all built rpms (order: reverse gelide)
RPMLINT report: =============== (none): E: badness 30100 exceeds threshold 1000, aborting. [ 385.000533] SysRq : Power Off [ 386.558475] Power down. ----- cut -----
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org
participants (3)
-
Boris Manojlovic -
David Lemke -
Peter Linnell