[opensuse-packaging] sysprof removed?
Didn't we use to ship sysprof? Has it been removed from the distro for 11.0? I'm asking because it's so useful to me, and I don't think I'm the only one. I'd consider maintaining it. -- Hans Petter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
Am Freitag 04 April 2008 schrieb Hans Petter Jansson:
Didn't we use to ship sysprof? Has it been removed from the distro for 11.0? I'm asking because it's so useful to me, and I don't think I'm the only one. I'd consider maintaining it.
It was dropped by greg (reviewing KMPs) with the following comment: "system profiler, with the advent of oprofile, I think this can be dropped" I would put it in build service. Greetings, Stephan -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 10:33 +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Freitag 04 April 2008 schrieb Hans Petter Jansson:
Didn't we use to ship sysprof? Has it been removed from the distro for 11.0? I'm asking because it's so useful to me, and I don't think I'm the only one. I'd consider maintaining it.
It was dropped by greg (reviewing KMPs) with the following comment: "system profiler, with the advent of oprofile, I think this can be dropped"
I would put it in build service.
It was developed specifically because oprofile is more complex to use, so I don't think it's redundant, unless oprofile got a lot better over the last year or so. -- Hans Petter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
* Hans Petter Jansson (hpj@novell.com) [20080404 10:41]:
It was developed specifically because oprofile is more complex to use, so I don't think it's redundant, unless oprofile got a lot better over the last year or so.
Well, create a buildservice project (or become part of an existing like devel:tools), grab the sources from /work/SRC/old-versions/10.3/all/sysprof (nbg network) and move them there. Philipp --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 10:33 +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
It was dropped by greg (reviewing KMPs) with the following comment: "system profiler, with the advent of oprofile, I think this can be dropped"
Heh. "We have as, let's drop gcc" :) Seriously, sysprof is really nice to use as a profiling tool (it's what we've been using all along to profile glib, gtk+, pango...). I vote for bringing it back to the distro. Federico --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 20:30 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
Seriously, sysprof is really nice to use as a profiling tool (it's what we've been using all along to profile glib, gtk+, pango...). I vote for bringing it back to the distro.
I second that. -- Hans Petter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
Am Donnerstag, 10. April 2008 schrieb Hans Petter Jansson:
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 20:30 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
Seriously, sysprof is really nice to use as a profiling tool (it's what we've been using all along to profile glib, gtk+, pango...). I vote for bringing it back to the distro.
I second that.
Guys - the maintainer gets a notification when someone files a drop request and noone of gnome-maintainers@suse.de said anything. Perhaps someone should start reading that list? Greetings, Stephan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 08:03 +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 10. April 2008 schrieb Hans Petter Jansson:
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 20:30 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
Seriously, sysprof is really nice to use as a profiling tool (it's what we've been using all along to profile glib, gtk+, pango...). I vote for bringing it back to the distro.
I second that.
Guys - the maintainer gets a notification when someone files a drop request and noone of gnome-maintainers@suse.de said anything. Perhaps someone should start reading that list?
Where can I sign up for it? I don't see it on lists.suse.de. Is it the same general format as the dist mails I get to hpj@suse.de? I get ~100 of those on some days, usually one per change per product per architecture, e.g: --- Detected the following changes in file list of gdm Distribution: sles10-s390x +/opt/gnome/share/gnome/help/gdm/zh_HK/gdm.cache.bz2 -/opt/gnome/share/gnome/help/gdm/fr/gdm.cache.bz2 PS: Note that all occurrences of %{VERSION}-%{RELEASE} are replaced by the verbatim string $VERSION-$RELEASE to minimize useless output. --- That aside, I'm not sure it's good process to assume you can drop someone else's package if he fails to respond to a generated mail. For a decision like that, it might be better to require the maintainer's explicit consent, to make sure he's in the loop - and not on vacation or otherwise missing mails. -- Hans Petter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
On Thursday 10 April 2008, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:
Is it the same general format as the dist mails I get to hpj@suse.de? I get ~100 of those on some days, usually one per change per product per architecture, e.g:
Many thanks for posting internal email to a public mailing list. Yes, it is with those emails. Actually they're from PDB, and they have PDB: in the subject, and a special email address, which should be easy for you to recognize.
That aside, I'm not sure it's good process to assume you can drop someone else's package if he fails to respond to a generated mail. For a decision like that, it might be better to require the maintainer's explicit consent, to make sure he's in the loop - and not on vacation or otherwise missing mails.
How do you expect to get maintainers consent if the maintainer is a group of people, and none of them answering? Greetings, Dirk -- RPMLINT information under http://en.opensuse.org/Packaging/RpmLint --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 08:03 +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Guys - the maintainer gets a notification when someone files a drop request and noone of gnome-maintainers@suse.de said anything. Perhaps someone should start reading that list?
I'm subscribed, but stopped reading it a long time ago --- it's pretty hard to sift out the sporadic interesting stuff from the thousands of machine-generated mails. Federico --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
On 2008-04-10 10:59:34 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 08:03 +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Guys - the maintainer gets a notification when someone files a drop request and noone of gnome-maintainers@suse.de said anything. Perhaps someone should start reading that list?
I'm subscribed, but stopped reading it a long time ago --- it's pretty hard to sift out the sporadic interesting stuff from the thousands of machine-generated mails.
and you got no method to sort machine generated mails into different folders than other mails? but it might explain why mailing gnome-maintainers sometimes gets no reaction. darix -- openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux openSUSE is good for you www.opensuse.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 18:45 +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
but it might explain why mailing gnome-maintainers sometimes gets no reaction.
When was the last time that happened? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
participants (7)
-
Dirk Mueller
-
Federico Mena Quintero
-
Hans Petter Jansson
-
Marcus Rueckert
-
Michael Wolf
-
Philipp Thomas
-
Stephan Kulow