[opensuse-packaging] xinc package in s:p:a in bad shape - somebody take over?
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/5ecd2370515d7d1fc6bd26ffeba0e952.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi folks, Is somebody interested in taking care of the xinc php CI server? The current package in server:php:applications has a confusion mix of contradicting license tags (BSD vs LGPL, probably LGPL-2.1+), is rather old (2 years - it's not even offered on the current project pear server) and would probably not be accepted into factory as of now. It also has some patches which I cannot quickly evaluate and the .changes file is missing. Does anything depend on it? I don't think we should keep having it in the repo in its current form. -- Ralf Lang Linux Consultant / Developer Tel.: +49-170-6381563 Mail: lang@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org
![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/5ecd2370515d7d1fc6bd26ffeba0e952.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Am 22.02.2012 15:33, schrieb Ralf Lang:
Hi folks,
Is somebody interested in taking care of the xinc php CI server? The current package in server:php:applications has a confusion mix of contradicting license tags (BSD vs LGPL, probably LGPL-2.1+), is rather old (2 years - it's not even offered on the current project pear server) and would probably not be accepted into factory as of now.
It also has some patches which I cannot quickly evaluate and the .changes file is missing.
Does anything depend on it? I don't think we should keep having it in the repo in its current form.
Last call. This package is about to be dropped from s:p:a if there is no opposition. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org
participants (1)
-
Ralf Lang