![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/9d46eeed4de01dd50e3fd70bd660969b.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
* Sascha Manns <Sascha.Manns@open-slx.de> [2011-12-25 14:57]:
Hello mates,
i'm trying to build a new packageversion. The old Licenses Field was "GPLv3 or later". If i'm going to: http://license.opensuse.org/ and place GPLv3 there, the Site proposes to use "GPL-3". If i'm placing this into the Licenses Field i become: kvirustotal-lang.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL-3 kvirustotal.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPL-3 kvirustotal.src: W: invalid-license GPL-3 The specified license string is not recognized. Please refer to http://license.opensuse.org/ for the list of known licences and their exact spelling.
But why this false? Does anyone knows more?
Use the abbreviations from http://www.spdx.org/licenses/ instead, in this case "GPL-3.0+". Great that works. Thanks a lot. I've not seen that page before. Now i'ts a
Guido Berhoerster wrote at Sonntag, 25. Dezember 2011, 16:01:16: part of my Bookmark Collection :-) -- Sincerly yours Sascha Manns Community &Support Agent open-slx GmbH http://www.open-slx.de (Business) http://saigkill.homelinux.net (Private) This mail is written with Balsam Professional 12.1