On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 04:09:18PM +0100, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
Marco is right though. The package name is not the same for the normal i586 package and the 32bit one. Therefore the automatic provides are different and the %name(x86-32) one is basically useless.
The regular package would provide
%name(x86-32) = %version-%release
while the -32bit version basically has
%name-32bit(x86-32) = %version-%release
So what's missing is the original name with architecture. In the concrete case of alsa-plugins-pulse-32bit it provides only alsa-plugins-pulse-32bit(x86-32) instead of alsa-plugins-pulse(x86-32)
It's not missing. It also does not provide "alsa-plugins-pulse" and you're not arguing that the provides is missing. (The color-extended self provides really don't make much sense for suse systems, they only got added by Fedora because they have multiple packages with the same name and different arch installed and had no way to address the specific architecture.) M. -- Michael Schroeder mls@suse.de SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF Jeff Hawn, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);} -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org