On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 02:19:53PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:55:14 +0100, Thomas Schraitle wrote:
over the years, I've collected a bunch of great fonts in my home repository. However, it seems we don't have a consistent naming schema for fonts. Although the Packaging Guidelines[1] links to the old Wiki[2], the information therein is printed in red and I'm not sure how useful is this nowadays.
This has some interesting effects. If you search for fonts like this:
# zypper se font
you will get _some_ but not all. For example, the popular Linux Libertine and DejaVu fonts are not listed. A user has to _know_ the name. IMHO this is not very intuitive and userfriendly.
True. (Though, this reminds me whether any possibility to search for RPM group...)
Btw, rpm automatically adds some font() provides *if* the fonconfig package was installed when the package was built. This seems to be true of only a couple of our font packages, though. Cheers, Michael. -- Michael Schroeder mls@suse.de SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF Jeff Hawn, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);} -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org