![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/5208f59307a2705ba9811a153406f094.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Jan 19, 10 09:29:48 +0200, Dave Plater wrote:
So the License: in the spec file for ghostscript-omni is supposed to be? :- a) The same as the actual license in the Omni directory of the source - LGPLv2.1
ghostscript-8.70.tar.bz2/ghostscript-8.70/contrib/gomni.c is LGPLv2.1 I could not find an omni directory in the source.
or b) The same as the ghostscript-8.70 license - GPLv3
The header files linked into gomni.c appear to be under artifex license. Which I will consider to be GPLv2+ for our purposes. I assume that ghostscript-omni only contains one driver binary. Technically correct is then: LGPLv2.1 & GPLv2+ [& ...] Add more licenses [& ...], as you find them being for everything that is integrated into the omni-binary. If and how the end construct of that mix is sane, is a second question. Sigh. cheers, JW- -- o \ Juergen Weigert paint it green! __/ _=======.=======_ <V> | jw@suse.de back to ascii! __/ _---|____________\/ \ | 0911 74053-508 __/ (____/ /\ (/) | _____________________________/ _/ \_ vim:set sw=2 wm=8 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org