El Miércoles, 23 de Noviembre de 2005 21:06, Pascal Bleser escribió:
That's an always recurring issue. That's why I was speaking of having different repositories tagged as "experimental" and "stable", some 2 or 3 months ago. But Sonja bashed me on the opensuse list for being too debian ;)) (although to me it's not the same as Debian, it's just for community packager repositories, not for the core distribution itself).
If people want the latest bleeding edge snapshot, then they use also add the "experimental" repository. If not, if they just want the latest stable releases, then they only use the "stable" repository.
If you stick with "amsn_cvs", I'd strongly suggest to include a "Conflicts: amsn" in the spec file (if you didn't do it already ;)).
Of course I did it :). And also I think is a good idea to have stable and experimental repositories. I'm not stuck with amsn_cvs, but because I already released the packages, I think it is better to left the things as is. I'd have to consult this stuff to the list before release the RPMS :( Guillermo -- Guillermo Ballester Valor gbv@oxixares.com Ogijares, Granada SPAIN Public GPG KEY http://www.oxixares.com/~gbv/pubgpg.html #################################################### See World Weather Navigator at http://www.ogimet.com ####################################################