El Miércoles, 23 de Noviembre de 2005 20:12, Jorge Luis Arzola escribió:
Hi:
El Miércoles, 23 de Noviembre de 2005 18:50, Guillermo Ballester Valor
escribió:
Hello Pascal,
El Miércoles, 23 de Noviembre de 2005 17:44, Pascal Bleser escribió:
Guillermo Ballester Valor wrote:
Hello,
Hola Guillermo
I've build new RPM packages for amsn, cvs version. They are called 'amsn_cvs' and have some nice and new features with respect the relased 'amsn 0.94'. Note that it is a development version. To install 'amsn_cvs' RPMs you need uninstall 'amsn' because of some conflicts.
If both packages conflict anyway, why do you call it "amsn_cvs" and not just "amsn" ?
I agree with pascal. Since the cvs package can not be installed in parrallel with the stable amsn, then there is no reason to use a different naming scheme.
Jorge, My aim was not to force any user of amsn-0.94 to upgrade to a cvs version when doing, as example, 'apt-get upgrade'. As I said, my first atempt was a naming scheme as you and Pascal suggested. May be I was wrong when I changed my mind. Cheers, Guillermo -- Guillermo Ballester Valor gbv@oxixares.com Ogijares, Granada SPAIN Public GPG KEY http://www.oxixares.com/~gbv/pubgpg.html #################################################### See World Weather Navigator at http://www.ogimet.com ####################################################