Am Freitag, 28. August 2009 10:44:22 schrieb Vincent Untz:
Le mercredi 26 août 2009, à 14:42 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Le mardi 25 août 2009, à 17:32 +0200, Stephan Kulow a écrit :
Yes, this is _exactly_ what should be done. Building against snapshot should be actually the preferred solution for all but a very limited set of projects out there.
I'll change G:F to build against snapshot once we'll be ready to start a fun new "let's rebuild everything in G:F" cycle. Should be sometimes today or tomorrow.
Done.
And then there is question when to sync snapshot. Right now it's done (if I remember) before full rebuilds, but it's possible to couple it with the publishing of /factory/repo/oss (in theory, I have no clue about the code in question :)
Yeah, it'd be nice to do this change. This should avoid some potential issues where some ABI in standard and snapshots are different (in a library that is not correctly versioned, eg).
How can I help make this happen? :-)
I am currently thinking about some concept how to do this every repo, without the need to create another one like snapshot. However, this will end up in more package builds, when we have it. So we will be less often in "blocked" but way more in "scheduled" due to the increased job numbers :/ So I am not that sure that this will be helpfull at all. bye adrian -- Adrian Schroeter SUSE Linux Products GmbH email: adrian@suse.de -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org