On 08/16/2016 12:37 PM, Thomas Bechtold wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:00:43PM +0200, Bruno Friedmann wrote:
On samedi, 13 août 2016 10.33:00 h CEST Michael Ströder wrote:
HI!
Any reason why so many Python module packages have the misnomer python-python-* as package names? And the set of this misnomers even grow.
Since ages the convention is that a distribution package name of a Python module should be "python-<import-name>". This convention is wildly violated. And it makes authors of cross-platform ansible plays, puppet modules, chef receipts, etc. even more miserable.
Ciao, Michael.
After reading the whole thread, I would like to try to summarize it a bit so we can decide as a community how we can move forward.
1) We have a tool python-py2pac and almost python3-py2pac https://github.com/saschpe/py2pack https://github.com/saschpe/py2pack/issues/59
I basically took over maintainership for py2pack and did some improvements in the past (see i.e. https://toabctl.wordpress.com/2016/07/03/improved-python-packaging-for-opens... ). I already talked to Sascha and he's fine with moving py2pack to the openSUSE github namespace. Is there a process to request this? Or should I just move it and update the wiki and the documentation?
Yes, just move it and update the wiki and docs. Later, Robert -- Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU Public Cloud Architect LINUX rjschwei@suse.com IRC: robjo -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org