![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/083c496e0807944dca7a26c0c3dd68f4.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
2 Nov
2009
2 Nov
'09
16:16
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Pavol Rusnak <prusnak@suse.cz> wrote:
On 11/02/2009 10:30 AM, Ludwig Nussel wrote:
What about calling it spec2changelog and including it in the build package? changelog2spec is already there and also requires perl-TimeDate already.
Argh, it's the same story over and over again. Why don't we drop the .changes file in favour of using %changelog in spec?
-- Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol RUSNAK SUSE LINUX, s.r.o
I agree. What are the benefits of keeping them separate? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org