On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:40 AM, Adam Spiers <aspiers@suse.com> wrote:
Marco Cimmino Gibellini (marco.cimmino@skype.net) wrote:
If openSUSE community is however not interested in a fully working out-of-the-box openSUSE rpm package then we may think to remove support for it and be happy with Fedora's RPM package which seems much easier to produce for us.
Of course we're interested :-) That's why you already got ~20 replies within 24 hours or so. But it seems your question is unusual enough
I rather consider unusual forcing two packages with identical content but different names.
that the right answer was not immediately obvious. Did you try Claudio's suggestion of
Recommend: alsa-plugins-pulse-32bit
It does not work when using rpm directly and even with zypper users are free to use --no-recommends. You can just as well simply describe this requirement on download page. Is there any reason why 32 bit libraries cannot provide libname(32bit) just like 64 bit libraries provide libname(64bit)? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org