Hey all, I have been seeing a disturbing trend in the openSUSE Twitter[1] and Mastodon[2] accounts, where we are sending messages tearing down the CentOS Project[3][4][5][6]. As an openSUSE contributor who spends *a lot* of time trying to use and promote openSUSE sensibly, I was disheartened by the lack of professionalism and support to our fellow project trying to develop a contributor-oriented community like we have for openSUSE Leap. The worst part about it is that the attacks are a "stone and glass house" kind of affair. openSUSE Leap has roughly the same lifespan as CentOS Stream, and contributions to CentOS Stream effectively work the same way as contributions to openSUSE Leap does. If people start teasing apart what we actually *offer* compared to CentOS Stream, they will be disappointed to find that we're not that much different from them. And the truth is, I couldn't be happier! If anything, we should be supporting that project, and drawing parallels to openSUSE Leap as a *model* of how CentOS Stream can be done. We've successfully integrated the enterprise and the community together in a stable, reliable, rock-solid platform. When openSUSE made the change to openSUSE Leap, nobody from Red Hat or Fedora said bad things about us. In fact, they've been generally supportive of our efforts. I have personally had conversations with a number of folks at Red Hat talking about the model of excellence that is openSUSE Leap. And now, Red Hat is taking a "Leap" of faith with CentOS and RHEL, and we're tearing them down for trying to be more open? That's utterly hypocritical and I'm disgusted. As a member of the openSUSE community, I'm disappointed and saddened by how we're not trying to support each other. Our friends at Red Hat and Fedora have supported us, this is our turn to support them. That doesn't mean we can't take the opportunity to talk about openSUSE Leap. There is plenty to love about openSUSE Leap for folks everywhere. But tearing down CentOS to promote openSUSE Leap is not the right way. Regards, Neal [1]: https://twitter.com/openSUSE [2]: https://fosstodon.org/@opensuse [3]: https://twitter.com/openSUSE/status/1339648215713509377 [4]: https://twitter.com/openSUSE/status/1339956419462918147 [5]: https://fosstodon.org/@opensuse/105389999148802875 [6]: https://fosstodon.org/@opensuse/105390670556405421 -- Neal Gompa (ID: Pharaoh_Atem)
I agree with Neal! As I mentioned on Discord having a healthy competition between projects is fine, but when it comes to pity taunting that is not the way to attract new users/contributors. Other projects doing this type of unprofessional marketing might work for those projects, however, this also invites potentially toxic people into our community. Toxic messages will be well received by toxic people. Based on the past few weeks happenings on the ML this looks like something that we're trying to avoid? AFAIK openSUSE and RH/Fedora has a pretty good relationship going. What do you think, with these type of messages how long will that last? What is the expected ROI on this kind of responses to a project that is stuck between a rock and a very hard place right now? Whoever is responsible posting these pity taunting messages I strongly suggest to have a good read of this: https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Guiding_principles#We_value... There is nothing respectable in this type of "marketing". As an openSUSE member these were my responses to people coming after and bashing on CentOS: https://twitter.com/AttilaNuke/status/1338305668369944576?s=20 https://twitter.com/AttilaNuke/status/1337764549873680386?s=20 https://twitter.com/AttilaNuke/status/1337373249198379010?s=20 https://twitter.com/AttilaNuke/status/1337231838075469825?s=20 https://twitter.com/AttilaNuke/status/1336872649859821570?s=20 https://twitter.com/AttilaNuke/status/1338305668369944576?s=20 https://twitter.com/AttilaNuke/status/1337231838075469825?s=20 I made one comment which was distasteful and after talking with Neal and better understanding what is really happening I deleted it: https://twitter.com/AttilaNuke/status/1340023242447151104?s=20 Br, A. P.S.: Btw I am one of three - with Adrien and Ivo - who jump-started not long ago the docs project to aid new users coming to openSUSE in having an easier start and understanding of the project and tools.
[ Removing one of Doug's three addresses, and Stasiek is on board@ ] Hi Neal, On Fri 2020-12-18, Neal Gompa wrote:
And now, Red Hat is taking a "Leap" of faith with CentOS and RHEL, and we're tearing them down for trying to be more open?
I'm not sure I completely agree with your description of the changes around CentOS, but that's not the point here. I personally oppose¹ those Tweets coming from the @openSUSE account and suggest we (i.e., someone with access to the account, unlike me) take them down. And refrain from going into that direction in the future. Gerald ¹ anti-support isn't an English verb, I guess?
Hi all,
The former mentioned about CentOS and suggesting Leaf lead to constructive discussions, so these are OK and healthy as it leads to insights on both sides.
But yes, a retweet with a negative tone can only lead to negativity. Any official account should uphold social values and respect. Especially online it shouldn't be about bashing or gaining at the cost of others. We are working in the same community for the same gains; making OSS successful. Calling out for dialog sure, but this isn't that.
Regards,
Gerard
Note: Although I work for Red Hat, these views are my own. I have respect for SUSE and the openSUSE community. Especially as I assist them here in Asia/China to develop and grow. Had many good conversations with jzb before he moved.
________________________________
From: Gerald Pfeifer
And now, Red Hat is taking a "Leap" of faith with CentOS and RHEL, and we're tearing them down for trying to be more open?
I'm not sure I completely agree with your description of the changes around CentOS, but that's not the point here. I personally oppose¹ those Tweets coming from the @openSUSE account and suggest we (i.e., someone with access to the account, unlike me) take them down. And refrain from going into that direction in the future. Gerald ¹ anti-support isn't an English verb, I guess?
Hi all,
I hope you all had some happy holidays with friends and family. As unfortunate as what is describe in this thread is, it brings up some valid points about communities socially and publicly interacting with each other during trying times such like the situation surrounding CentOS or any future situation that could arise. The topic appears to has been discussed and is being addressed through various channels from what I have seen so far.
v/r
Doug
________________________________
From: Gerard Braad
And now, Red Hat is taking a "Leap" of faith with CentOS and RHEL, and we're tearing them down for trying to be more open?
I'm not sure I completely agree with your description of the changes around CentOS, but that's not the point here. I personally oppose¹ those Tweets coming from the @openSUSE account and suggest we (i.e., someone with access to the account, unlike me) take them down. And refrain from going into that direction in the future. Gerald ¹ anti-support isn't an English verb, I guess?
Thanks for the followup Doug. On 1/5/21 5:30 AM, Douglas DeMaio wrote:
Hi all,
I hope you all had some happy holidays with friends and family. As unfortunate as what is describe in this thread is, it brings up some valid points about communities socially and publicly interacting with each other during trying times such like the situation surrounding CentOS or any future situation that could arise. The topic appears to has been discussed and is being addressed through various channels from what I have seen so far. v/r Doug
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Gerard Braad
*Sent:* Saturday, December 19, 2020 6:22 AM *To:* Gerald Pfeifer ; Neal Gompa *Cc:* marketing@lists.opensuse.org ; Douglas DeMaio ; ddemaio@suse.de ; board@opensuse.org ; Brian Proffitt ; Rich Bowen *Subject:* Re: What is going on with openSUSE Twitter and Mastodon?! Hi all, The former mentioned about CentOS and suggesting Leaf lead to constructive discussions, so these are OK and healthy as it leads to insights on both sides.
But yes, a retweet with a negative tone can only lead to negativity. Any official account should uphold social values and respect. Especially online it shouldn't be about bashing or gaining at the cost of others. We are working in the same community for the same gains; making OSS successful. Calling out for dialog sure, but this isn't that.
Regards,
Gerard
Note: Although I work for Red Hat, these views are my own. I have respect for SUSE and the openSUSE community. Especially as I assist them here in Asia/China to develop and grow. Had many good conversations with jzb before he moved.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Gerald Pfeifer
*Sent:* Saturday, December 19, 2020, 09:50 *To:* Neal Gompa *Cc:* marketing@lists.opensuse.org; Douglas DeMaio; ddemaio@suse.de; board@opensuse.org; Brian Proffitt; Rich Bowen; Gerard Braad *Subject:* Re: What is going on with openSUSE Twitter and Mastodon?! [ Removing one of Doug's three addresses, and Stasiek is on board@ ]
Hi Neal,
On Fri 2020-12-18, Neal Gompa wrote:
And now, Red Hat is taking a "Leap" of faith with CentOS and RHEL, and we're tearing them down for trying to be more open?
I'm not sure I completely agree with your description of the changes around CentOS, but that's not the point here.
I personally oppose¹ those Tweets coming from the @openSUSE account and suggest we (i.e., someone with access to the account, unlike me) take them down. And refrain from going into that direction in the future.
Gerald
¹ anti-support isn't an English verb, I guess?
participants (6)
-
Attila Pinter
-
Douglas DeMaio
-
Gerald Pfeifer
-
Gerard Braad
-
Neal Gompa
-
Rich Bowen