On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Vincent Untz <vuntz@opensuse.org> wrote:
Le vendredi 11 mars 2011, à 14:48 +0000, Nelson Marques a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Vincent Untz <vuntz@opensuse.org> wrote:
Le lundi 07 mars 2011, à 19:37 +0100, Kim Leyendecker a écrit :
What´s the technology way we want do for the 11.4 successor? [...] * KDE 4.x and GNOME 2.x _and_ GNOME 3.x
I don't think the GNOME team has planned to have both GNOME versions. If that's something people want to see happen, please show up at the GNOME team meetings or on opensuse-gnome :-)
I know the 'manpower' point of view, and against that there are no arguments. On the other side, considering that many people are throwing knifes at the alternative panels of G3 and stuff...
gnome-panel is still available in GNOME 3 :-) So we can still build a GNOME 2-like interface with GNOME 3 if we want. Some things will be different, but I'm pretty sure those wouldn't be that much of a big deal to most people.
Vincent, I haven't run GNOME3 with 'nomodeset' to check it out, but there's a lot of people bullying GNOME3 in Fedora... The panels were one of the reasons invoked, so that's why I mentioned it... so we don't have to go through the same. Well, from my tiny experience with GNOME Shell and GNOME3, I do see some potential on it, and by not making G2 available we might push people to be spend more time with shell, I would suppose that would also increase the number of converts to G3/Gnome-shell. Which honestly is a very good thing. Take a look at the Fedora Planet for some insight. If you want I can compile a small set of links. NM
Vincent
-- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org
-- Nelson Marques /* As cicatrizes lembram-nos de onde estivemos, mas não ditam para onde vamos */ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-marketing+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-marketing+help@opensuse.org