As said, one remaining question is the naming of the full fontset. Which is better: noto-sans-xx-fonts-full or noto-sans-xx-full-fonts?
I prefer noto-sans-xx-fonts-full because the latter one looks a package whose family name is "Noto Sanx XX Full". -- Fuminobu TAKEYAMA On 2017/05/04 22:32, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:56:59 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
JFYI,
I accepted these two SR's, and now google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts and google-noto-serif-cjk-fonts landed to M17N:fonts project, as well as the drop of noto-*-cjk from google-noto-fonts.
I'm not sure whether noto-sans-*-fonts-full package name is the right thing. Or better named to be noto-sans-*-full-fonts? I don't mind either cases, so I'd like to hear others' opinions.
Now the most important task is to check whether the upgrade expectedly. Once when confirmed to work, let's feed to FACTORY.
I tested the upgrade and it seems working. So, basically we're ready to submit to FACTORY.
As said, one remaining question is the naming of the full fontset. Which is better: noto-sans-xx-fonts-full or noto-sans-xx-full-fonts?
thanks,
Takashi
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-m17n+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-m17n+owner@opensuse.org