[kubic-bugs] [Bug 1076265] New: openSUSE-Tumbleweed-Kubic-release will never be updated
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076265 Bug ID: 1076265 Summary: openSUSE-Tumbleweed-Kubic-release will never be updated Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: P5 - None Component: Kubic Assignee: kubic-bugs@opensuse.org Reporter: kukuk@suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs@suse.de CC: dleuenberger@suse.com Found By: --- Blocker: --- openSUSE-Tumbleweed-Kubic-release is only on the Kubic media, which means, it will never be updated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076265 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076265#c1 Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar@opensuse.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dimstar@opensuse.org --- Comment #1 from Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar@opensuse.org> --- the problem we had in the past with openSUSE Kubic release in the FTP tree was that zypper/yast got confused with multiple products in the FTP tree; the latest yast changes for multi-product media might help in this case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076265 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076265#c2 Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jsrain@suse.com --- Comment #2 from Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk@suse.com> --- I understand the problems, but this makes the version info in /etc/os-release pretty useless and prevents me from building virtualisation images for MicroOS and Kubic. After we have the MicroOS systemrole out there, we need to look at this and find somehow a solution. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076265 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076265#c3 --- Comment #3 from Jiri Srain <jsrain@suse.com> --- I guess I'm missing something; what prevents the same product to be in the FTP tree? Do we need more of them - different ones - there? Different version should not hurt, this is what we have for SLES with Update channels. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076265 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076265#c4 --- Comment #4 from Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar@opensuse.org> --- (In reply to Jiri Srain from comment #3)
I guess I'm missing something; what prevents the same product to be in the FTP tree? Do we need more of them - different ones - there?
From memory, as I don't find the openQA test that did that (it's long ago we had both products in one FTP tree)
The installer had both products listed as 'going go to be installed'; but that was at the beginning we did some Kubic and then we filtered the Kubic-release from the FTP tree -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076265 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076265#c6 Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk@suse.com> --- Works now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com