On Tue, 2020-01-28 at 10:08 +0100, Ralf Haferkamp wrote:

On Tuesday, 28 January 2020 09:02:00 CET Jiri Slaby wrote:

...

On 28. 01. 20, 8:55, Dario Faggioli wrote:

...

So, here's the question: what should we do? Do we "promote" kvmsmall?

If you need severe changes, I wouldn't touch kvmsmall.

I guess the current answer is: We don't know yet. For now we could get most things to work with kvmsmall.

Sure, but just the other day, on this very list, it was said that: "the -kvmsmall flavor was *not* designed for "occasional home user" or, actually, any user. Its sole purpose is to serve as a flavor which builds as quickly as possible so that developers could quickly test their core fixes in a VM (or bisect regressions). Originally, we didn't even plan to build and publish it in BuildService" https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-kernel/2020-01/msg00019.html Which I think is incompatible with the idea of using it as a Kata Containers kernel. As, I don't think we want to tell our (potential) future Kata users: <<here, use Kata on openSUSE with a kernel which shouldn't really be used for anything other than debugging>> :-P I mean, it's fine that we're using it right now, given the experimental stage of the whole thing, but I don't really see it fitting going forward (which is why I started the thread :-P). Regards -- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D http://about.me/dario.faggioli Virtualization Software Engineer SUSE Labs, SUSE https://www.suse.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- <<This happens because _I_ choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)