[opensuse-kernel] Kernel:HEAD dtb-source not getting rebuilt for 4.8
Hi, We have aarch64 kernel-{source,default} 4.8.rc4 built now, but dtb-source and dtb-aarch64 are still at 4.7.0 and in published state. Might this be caused by the ARM repository being configured as rebuild="local"? We need to have all dtb-* packages rebuilt whenever the kernel sources change, and kernel-source does not look excluded from use-for-build... Regards, Andreas -- SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
Dne 3.9.2016 v 19:16 Andreas Färber napsal(a):
Hi,
We have aarch64 kernel-{source,default} 4.8.rc4 built now, but dtb-source and dtb-aarch64 are still at 4.7.0 and in published state.
Might this be caused by the ARM repository being configured as rebuild="local"?
rebuild="local" means that changes in the same repository trigger a rebuild, so this should be OK. The kernel-docs package got rebuilt just fine and I have no idea why the scheduler has not picked by the dtb-* packages. I triggered rebuild manually now: for p in $(osc ls Kernel:HEAD | grep dtb); do osc rebuild Kernel:HEAD $p; done Michal -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
Am 05.09.2016 um 08:41 schrieb Michal Marek:
[...] I triggered rebuild manually now:
for p in $(osc ls Kernel:HEAD | grep dtb); do osc rebuild Kernel:HEAD $p; done
Thanks. Is it worth trying that as well for the failed armv7l kernels? Is that the 4.7 OOM problem reported from elsewhere, or can we modify _constraints or something to fix that permanently? Doesn't look like a huge file to me... Regards, Andreas -- SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
On Sep 05 2016, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> wrote:
Dne 3.9.2016 v 19:16 Andreas Färber napsal(a):
Hi,
We have aarch64 kernel-{source,default} 4.8.rc4 built now, but dtb-source and dtb-aarch64 are still at 4.7.0 and in published state.
Might this be caused by the ARM repository being configured as rebuild="local"?
rebuild="local" means that changes in the same repository trigger a rebuild, so this should be OK.
Only if the sources change. Since dtb-source didn't change, it doesn't get rebuilt. There is no "local-recursive" rebuild strategy. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different." -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
Hi Michal, Am 06.09.2016 um 10:19 schrieb Andreas Schwab:
On Sep 05 2016, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> wrote:
Dne 3.9.2016 v 19:16 Andreas Färber napsal(a):
We have aarch64 kernel-{source,default} 4.8.rc4 built now, but dtb-source and dtb-aarch64 are still at 4.7.0 and in published state.
Might this be caused by the ARM repository being configured as rebuild="local"?
rebuild="local" means that changes in the same repository trigger a rebuild, so this should be OK.
Only if the sources change. Since dtb-source didn't change, it doesn't get rebuilt. There is no "local-recursive" rebuild strategy.
This issue is still with us... If you don't want to change the project meta, can you at least put the dtb-* retriggering in your crob job? Affects all the Kernel:* projects where those packages exist. Thanks, Andreas -- SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
On 2016-10-17 18:14, Andreas Färber wrote:
Hi Michal,
Am 06.09.2016 um 10:19 schrieb Andreas Schwab:
On Sep 05 2016, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz> wrote:
Dne 3.9.2016 v 19:16 Andreas Färber napsal(a):
We have aarch64 kernel-{source,default} 4.8.rc4 built now, but dtb-source and dtb-aarch64 are still at 4.7.0 and in published state.
Might this be caused by the ARM repository being configured as rebuild="local"?
rebuild="local" means that changes in the same repository trigger a rebuild, so this should be OK.
Only if the sources change. Since dtb-source didn't change, it doesn't get rebuilt. There is no "local-recursive" rebuild strategy.
This issue is still with us...
If you don't want to change the project meta, can you at least put the dtb-* retriggering in your crob job? Affects all the Kernel:* projects where those packages exist.
Would it make sense to move dtb-source to Kernel:HEAD:KMP? This one rebuild whenever there is a new kernel-source version. Thanks, Michal -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
participants (3)
-
Andreas Färber -
Andreas Schwab -
Michal Marek