On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 05:27:58PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Oct 12 2007 17:09, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
As 2.6.23 is now out, should we branch the 10.3 kernel tree from HEAD now? I think I'll be doing at least one more 2.6.22-stable release, which we should probably apply to the 10.3 kernel and push that out when it happens, but we should also work on moving on to 2.6.23.
Any thoughts?
Absolutely. I was going to branch it this week and try merging 2.6.23. I'd like to try to keep HEAD following mainline as closely as possible, even with no pending release. At the very least, it would be useful for handling bug reports so we can see if a particular bug has been solved in the next kernel cycle.
Jeff, could you rename also kernel-bigsmp to "kernel-pae", please?
It is not just a PAEd kernel, but also allows for a higher number of CPUs. That is the "big" in bigsmp.
We have the usability issue that Laptop users look strange if a "bigsmp" kernel gets installed (due to NX support requirements). So we would really like a neutral name here. We are open for other suggestions ;) Ciao, Marcus -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help@opensuse.org