On 2014-07-31 16:32, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
1) How do we handle releases of the Factory kernel? 2) What releases will be considered "supported" simultaneously?
For 1), I propose we make it official that Kernel:stable is now the external repository for openSUSE Factory. Even though Factory has already been pulling from Kernel:stable, making it an official thing means that security fixes and other backports are actively added to it rather than it being Jiri's side project.
OK. I added factory-maintainers to the Kernel:stable project, so that Coolo can pull from there. Or shall I automatically submit new kernels to devel:openSUSE:Factory:kernel?
As for 2), I'd like to hear suggestions. With only so much time to devote to supporting the Factory kernel, we'll need to find a balance between convenience for users and bugs actually getting fixed. We have options between supporting every release (which I would actively fight) and dropping support for any previous kernel as soon as a new one is added to the repository. I've added some interested parties to the CC list, but I'd like to hear from anyone with an opinion.
IMO having bugreportes reproduce with the latest stable kernel is not asking too much. The packages are conveniently available. Michal -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org