Hi Michal, Am 06.06.2017 um 10:33 schrieb Michal Marek:
Anyway, we drifted away from the topic a bit. I posted the RFC to ask if it is an acceptable trade off to have a shared mkspec-dtb script at the cost of occasionally having empty dtb-* packages.
Could you give us a verbose explanation of what the RFC is doing? For arm64 I would be fine with an auto-generated list of sub-packages: Every vendor directory arch/arm64/boot/dts/foo/ should get its own dtb-foo subpackage. That requires access to an expanded source tree, which I miss in mkspec-dtb. Lua script in the .spec might be a solution? For ARMv7 and ARMv6 things are more complicated, so I don't see how we could automate them... Even the soc-board.dts convention has exceptions. Regards, Andreas -- SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org