Hi, Am 18.08.2014 13:01, schrieb Takashi Iwai:
[...] what do you think of backup maintenance of Kernel:stable during your absence? Would you mind if anyone of kernel team takes over the role?
On a related matter, are the scripts that are used to maintain Kernel:HEAD and Kernel:stable actually in some public place others can submit patches against? * Kernel:stable "ARM" repository is building against openSUSE:12.2:ARM and failing with unresolvable pesign-obs-integration. Suggest to drop it, as armv7l and aarch64 are covered by the "ports" repository already. * Both Kernel:HEAD and Kernel:stable try to build "ARM" repository for x86_64, which is senseless (unresolvable). * Should Kernel:stable cover armv6l somehow? Kernel:HEAD does via Factory:ARM. 13.1:Ports includes armv6l, but 13.1:Update does not. Similarly there's no ppc64le stable kernel. Pointing this out since Kernel:stable has become the devel project for Factory, so it might make sense to detect build errors early. Also I find it rather confusing that the master branch is being updated to a stable kernel rather than doing that on the stable branch only, given that v3.17-rc1 was tagged the day before the update to v3.16.1. It results in a non-linear history wrt upstream git. Regards, Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org