On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 03:49:12PM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 06/11/2011 03:31 PM, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
On 06/11/2011 01:13 PM, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
Hi:
Currently Kernel:HEAD failed to build completely
All packages fail with
ake: Leaving directory `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/kernel-desktop-3.0/linux-3.0-rc2' ++ make -s kernelrelease -C /usr/src/packages/BUILD/kernel-desktop-3.0/linux-3.0-rc2 O=/usr/src/packages/BUILD/kernel-desktop-3.0/linux-obj + krel=3.0.0-rc2-1-desktop + '[' 3.0.0-rc2-1-desktop '!=' 3.0-rc2-1-desktop ']' + echo 'Kernel release mismatch: 3.0.0-rc2-1-desktop != 3.0-rc2-1-desktop' Kernel release mismatch: 3.0.0-rc2-1-desktop != 3.0-rc2-1-desktop + exit 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.t9w0V6 (%prep)
This is due to the kernel tarball's version number not matching what it reports its version number as during the build.
e.g. linux-3.0-rc2.tar.bz2 vs 3.0.0-rc2
Michal's fixed this in the upstream kernel already. I'll pull in the patches for our tree.
Or not. SUBLEVEL=0 is in Makefile, so the "empty" fix doesn't do anything. Looks like we'll need to work around it.
I'm still not sure if the SUBLEVEL will be set or not by Linus in the "final" 3.0 release. I tried to get a straight answer about this, but couldn't, last week. So it's still uncertian how this is going to work. Personally, I'd like to see him release "3.0.0" which makes my life easier by releasing "3.0.1" and a bit less confusing for people who are trying to figure out the relationship between "3.0" and "3.0.1" But in the end, I'm just happy the number changed, so I can't complain that much... greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+help@opensuse.org