![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/cb2aaf49f775c94d4056311eef22be7b.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 25.06.2014 11:29, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Wed, 25 Jun 2014 10:02:25 +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Hi,
This is pretty much history repeating, but I feel *very* disappointed with the way you treat Factory. Factory tumbles from one RC to another.
And while I try to get 3.15.1 in myself, you replace Kernel:HEAD with rc2? What's the thinking behind that? I guess it's not too far stretched to claim that no one is maintaining the kernel-source package in Factory. All packaging activities are done by brainless scripts ;(
IMO, a stable rolling release should take Kernel:stable instead. So it's a question again what is FACTORY.
Well, I don't mind what kernel is in factory as long as it works - if that's rc4 or rc7 or final doesn't matter to me. Neither as factory maintainer nor as factory user. But I want it maintained and submitted when it makes sense. What bothers me is this "I commit to git and I'm done - shall random scripts handle the rest" mentality. If that will go away in Kernel:stable, I'm fine with changing. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org