-----Original Message----- From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Sent: 10 January 2019 11:03 To: Guillaume GARDET <guillaume.gardet@free.fr> Cc: opensuse-kernel@opensuse.org; Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>; Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Subject: Re: [opensuse-kernel] [PATCH V2] config: arm64 switch from PREEMPT_NONE to PREEMPT
On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 10:50:59 +0100, Guillaume GARDET wrote:
as we need to have low latency on some systems.
Actually, it's an open question whether we still want to keep CONFIG_PREEMPT or not on other archs, too. CONFIG_PREEMPT hits performance significantly.
I don't know much about other distros, but IIRC, Fedora is using CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY instead. Ubuntu provide both non- preempt and CONFIG_PREEMPT versions? Correct me if wrong.
True for Fedora. Ubuntu has two flavors: CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY and CONFIG_PREEMPT. Default x86_64 is CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY. So, the question is more switching to CONFIG_PREEMPT or CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY, right?
It also aligns to default arm64 kernel config.
That's more convincing reason in this case, though :)
When in doubt , it is probably a good idea to follow defconfig. @Andreas, any opinion for aarch64 preemption model? Thanks, Guillaume
thanks,
Takashi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kernel+owner@opensuse.org