[Bug 1199211] New: set buildflags exclude on kernel devel project so that branched projects have proper build disables
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199211 Bug ID: 1199211 Summary: set buildflags exclude on kernel devel project so that branched projects have proper build disables Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel Assignee: kernel-bugs@opensuse.org Reporter: dmueller@suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs@suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Kernel:stable has an optimized build setup where the kernel-binaries flavor (kernel-default, debug and so on) are only build-enabled for the "standard"/"ports" repositories, not for the "QA repositories. This makes sense to me and is sensible to optimize rebuild performance on the build service. however, when I do branch kernel-source, a full project is replicated under my OBS home project, and that one has build flags enabled for all the repositories. So with other words the branch projects have a lot more packages to build than the main project. This is because build disables are not inheriting over branches, they get reset. After a chat with the OBS folks, these two options are there: * set a OBS:BranchSkipRepositories attribute on the project. that means that new project branches will entirely have the given repositories skipped when creating a branch. I personally think that isn't the desired behavior, as it would means things like kernel-obs-build etc are not properly tested * add a BuildFlags: excludebuild:$packagename to the prjconf. this inherits to all derived projects, also existing ones, and makes the disabled-flags setting obsolete. I have tested the following configuration successfully. There might be a script somewhere that needs to be adapted to generate this project config. otherwise I think manually maintaining it for now is fine also. %if "%_repository" == "QA" || "%_repository" == "QA_ports" || "%_repository" == "QA_ARM" || "%_repository" == "QA_PPC" || "%_repository" == "QA_RISCV" || "%_repository" == "QA_S390" BuildFlags: excludebuild:dtb-aarch64 BuildFlags: excludebuild:dtb-armv6l BuildFlags: excludebuild:dtb-armv7l BuildFlags: excludebuild:dtb-riscv64 BuildFlags: excludebuild:kernel-64kb BuildFlags: excludebuild:kernel-debug BuildFlags: excludebuild:kernel-default BuildFlags: excludebuild:kernel-docs BuildFlags: excludebuild:kernel-firmware BuildFlags: excludebuild:kernel-firmware:compressed BuildFlags: excludebuild:kernel-kvmsmall BuildFlags: excludebuild:kernel-lpae BuildFlags: excludebuild:kernel-pae BuildFlags: excludebuild:kernel-source BuildFlags: excludebuild:kernel-syms BuildFlags: excludebuild:kernel-syzkaller BuildFlags: excludebuild:kernel-vanilla BuildFlags: excludebuild:kernel-zfcpdump BuildFlags: excludebuild:pesign-obs-integration BuildFlags: excludebuild:qlogic-rules BuildFlags: excludebuild:systemtap %endif %if "%_repository" == "standard" || "%_repository" == "ports" || "%_repository" == "PPC" || "%_repository" == "RISCV" || "%_repository" == "S390" BuildFlags: excludebuild:kernel-obs-build BuildFlags: excludebuild:kernel-obs-qa %endif -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199211 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199211#c1 --- Comment #1 from Dirk Mueller <dmueller@suse.com> --- we need to undo the excludebuild for qa, so something like %if "%_repository" == "QA" || "%_repository" == "QA_ports" || "%_repository" == "QA_ARM" || "%_repository" == "QA_PPC" || "%_repository" == "QA_RISCV" || "%_repository" == "QA_S390" BuildFlags: !excludebuild:kernel-obs-build BuildFlags: !excludebuild:kernel-obs-qa %endif needs to be added on top -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199211 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199211#c3 --- Comment #3 from Dirk Mueller <dmueller@suse.com> --- if you branch then you get by default the same repository names, so that should be fine. if you're modifying from the default you can do so and that would still not make the situation any worse than it is today. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199211 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199211#c1 --- Comment #1 from Dirk Mueller <dmueller@suse.com> --- we need to undo the excludebuild for qa, so something like %if "%_repository" == "QA" || "%_repository" == "QA_ports" || "%_repository" == "QA_ARM" || "%_repository" == "QA_PPC" || "%_repository" == "QA_RISCV" || "%_repository" == "QA_S390" BuildFlags: !excludebuild:kernel-obs-build BuildFlags: !excludebuild:kernel-obs-qa %endif needs to be added on top -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199211 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199211#c3 --- Comment #3 from Dirk Mueller <dmueller@suse.com> --- if you branch then you get by default the same repository names, so that should be fine. if you're modifying from the default you can do so and that would still not make the situation any worse than it is today. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@suse.com