http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1180821 Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar@opensuse.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dimstar@opensuse.org Blocks| |1029961 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1180821 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1180821#c2 --- Comment #2 from Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar@opensuse.org> --- (In reply to Takashi Iwai from comment #1)

AFAIK, kmod never supported /usr/lib/modprobe.d in the upstream code. /lib/modprobe.d and /run/modprobe.d are hard-coded, in addition to $SYSCONFIG/modprobe.d.

Maybe casually it works on Fedora where /usr/lib is a symlink to /lib?

Very likely, yes - but considering our efforts for /usr merge, we should move forward and allow /usr/lib/modprobe.d as well (without symlink hacks) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1180821 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1180821#c4 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|kernel-bugs@opensuse.org |msuchanek@suse.com --- Comment #4 from Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com> --- (In reply to Dominique Leuenberger from comment #3)

And we have

./macros.d/macros.systemd:%_modprobedir /usr/lib/modprobe.d

systemd (upstream) installs a file to /usr/lib/modprobe.d and advertises this macro as part of the default config

Essentially, we have an integration issue between the components

Yeah it looks so. The needed change for kmod must be trivial, but maybe this should be discussed with the upstream. Reassigned to the kmod package maintainer. Michal, could you take a look? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.