[opensuse-kde] Nepomuk and Thunderbird
Can Nepomuk be configured to index emails within Thunderbird? Using KDE 4.10.3. thanx Malte -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kde+owner@opensuse.org
On Wednesday 26 June 2013 20:01:35 Malte Gell wrote:
Can Nepomuk be configured to index emails within Thunderbird? Using KDE 4.10.3.
thanx Malte
Hi Malte, Unfortunately no. Theoretically it would be possible if somebody would write an indexing agent for Nepomuk that can read the Thunderbird folders, but at the moment there is only an indexing agent for Akonadi-based resources (which for email is KMail). Regards Raymond -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kde+owner@opensuse.org
Am 26.06.2013 21:32, schrieb Raymond Wooninck:
On Wednesday 26 June 2013 20:01:35 Malte Gell wrote:
Can Nepomuk be configured to index emails within Thunderbird? Using KDE 4.10.3.
thanx Malte
Hi Malte,
Unfortunately no. Theoretically it would be possible if somebody would write an indexing agent for Nepomuk that can read the Thunderbird folders, but at the moment there is only an indexing agent for Akonadi-based resources (which for email is KMail).
Okay. Maybe it is time to give Kmail2 a chance again. But after many disappointing bugs concerning filtering that never were fixed I hesitate much to use it again.... Malte -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kde+owner@opensuse.org
On Wednesday 26 June 2013 23:36:11 Malte Gell wrote:
Am 26.06.2013 21:32, schrieb Raymond Wooninck:
On Wednesday 26 June 2013 20:01:35 Malte Gell wrote:
Can Nepomuk be configured to index emails within Thunderbird? Using KDE 4.10.3.
thanx Malte
Hi Malte,
Unfortunately no. Theoretically it would be possible if somebody would write an indexing agent for Nepomuk that can read the Thunderbird folders, but at the moment there is only an indexing agent for Akonadi-based resources (which for email is KMail).
Okay. Maybe it is time to give Kmail2 a chance again. But after many disappointing bugs concerning filtering that never were fixed I hesitate much to use it again....
Depending on what you need I would still recommend to wait a bit longer. It looks like atm filtering works about 90% - that's not 100% yet ;-)
Malte
Am 27.06.2013 11:59, schrieb Jos Poortvliet:
Depending on what you need I would still recommend to wait a bit longer. It looks like atm filtering works about 90% - that's not 100% yet ;-)
What´s atm? I don´t use sieve filter rules, I need local filter rules on pop3 and IMAP and that has worked very poorly in the past with Kmail2..... Malte
On Thursday 27 June 2013 16:42:46 Malte Gell wrote:
Am 27.06.2013 11:59, schrieb Jos Poortvliet:
Depending on what you need I would still recommend to wait a bit longer. It looks like atm filtering works about 90% - that's not 100% yet ;-)
What´s atm? I don´t use sieve filter rules, I need local filter rules on pop3 and IMAP and that has worked very poorly in the past with Kmail2.....
Well, that's still the case. There have been improvements but you can still occasional have stuff that's not filtered properly. The problem is the usual - the developers use sieve for their filtering and they of course attempt to find bugs but can't always reproduce them...
Malte
participants (3)
-
Jos Poortvliet -
Malte Gell -
Raymond Wooninck