KMail 1.5.4 (KDE 3.1.4) and s/mime (cryptplug)
Hi, seems that kmail 1.5.4 still cannot handle signed mails other than from the built-in gpg support. That _does_ suck. or can anyone who got my key from a keyserver verify this signed mail? bye, MH -- Die unaufgeforderte Zusendung einer Werbemail an Privatleute verstößt gegen §1 UWG und 823 I BGB (Beschluß des LG Berlin vom 2.8.1998 Az: 16 O 201/98). Jede kommerzielle Nutzung der übermittelten persönlichen Daten sowie deren Weitergabe an Dritte ist ausdrücklich untersagt! gpg key fingerprint: 5F64 4C92 9B77 DE37 D184 C5F9 B013 44E7 27BD 763C
Hi Mathias! Your message is signed correctly (verified with horde's imp webmail suite). But the opengpg cryptplug module seems not to be able to verify the signature correctly. Perhaps kmail adds additional characters (linefeeds or something) when extracting the mime parts, so the signature doesn't match anymore...? But since what version do we have this problem? I thought I tried gpg cryptplug support extensively after installing this thing. I think (but don't know) that I was running kmail 1.5.1 or something when I installed cryptplug... but I don't know... Bad memory... CRC checksum failed... Press CTRL-A for Aspirin... Greets, Daniel Am Donnerstag, 25. September 2003 19:53 schrieb Mathias Homann:
Hi,
seems that kmail 1.5.4 still cannot handle signed mails other than from the built-in gpg support.
That _does_ suck.
or can anyone who got my key from a keyserver verify this signed mail?
bye, MH
Am Donnerstag, 25. September 2003 20:27 schrieb Daniel Eckl:
But since what version do we have this problem? I thought I tried gpg cryptplug support extensively after installing this thing. I think (but don't know) that I was running kmail 1.5.1 or something when I installed cryptplug... but I don't know...
see this post in suse-security: http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-security/2003-Sep/0243.html Seems that the problem exists since somewhen in mid-september. I _do_ hope suse fixes that. and soon. bye, MH
Hmmm, I think this is mainly the job of the KDE programmers to fix this. But perhaps SuSE can help them with a patch... I think this depends on the actual task and severity list of Adrian Schroeter. Adrian, do you hear us begging over there in Nuremberg? ;))) Greets, Daniel Am Donnerstag, 25. September 2003 21:17 schrieb Mathias Homann:
see this post in suse-security: http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-security/2003-Sep/0243.html Seems that the problem exists since somewhen in mid-september. I _do_ hope suse fixes that. and soon.
On Thursday 25 September 2003 19:53, Mathias Homann wrote:
Hi,
seems that kmail 1.5.4 still cannot handle signed mails other than from the built-in gpg support.
That _does_ suck.
or can anyone who got my key from a keyserver verify this signed mail?
Yes. Update Your KMail to latest from 3.1.4 and configure it correctly. Thomas
Am Freitag, 26. September 2003 11:37 schrieb Thomas Vollmer:
On Thursday 25 September 2003 19:53, Mathias Homann wrote:
Hi,
seems that kmail 1.5.4 still cannot handle signed mails other than from the built-in gpg support.
That _does_ suck.
or can anyone who got my key from a keyserver verify this signed mail?
Yes. Update Your KMail to latest from 3.1.4 and configure it correctly.
I _did_ update (that is the _point_ of this thread). And where did the configuration change, so that i have to change settings that were working 'back in kde 3.1.2'?? btw, why does it verify a signed and encrypted message ok, while the same message, to the same recipicent and signed with the same key, just without the encryption, gets the red frame? bye, MH -- Die unaufgeforderte Zusendung einer Werbemail an Privatleute verstößt gegen §1 UWG und 823 I BGB (Beschluß des LG Berlin vom 2.8.1998 Az: 16 O 201/98). Jede kommerzielle Nutzung der übermittelten persönlichen Daten sowie deren Weitergabe an Dritte ist ausdrücklich untersagt! gpg key fingerprint: 5F64 4C92 9B77 DE37 D184 C5F9 B013 44E7 27BD 763C
participants (3)
-
Daniel Eckl -
Mathias Homann -
Thomas Vollmer