2010/7/9 Markus S. <markus.s@kdemail.net>:
Why not create a KDE:/45 repo now? It could be officially maintained till November (and Factory be just a link to /45) and then left to the community (of whom either a few pick up the work or at least keep an unmaintained SC 4.5
I have been doing this since... always. So feel free to add me as maintainer/bugowner of such a repo. I would not be looking at KDE SVN for security fixes, but I could keep it building and updated to newer minor versions. To avoid problems to users I agree, the best way is to do the main development in KDE:45 and aggregate from Factory until it moves to 4.6. But that's not so good for devs, that expect K:D:F to be the development KDE repo. The best thing would be to keep K:D:F as now, and aggregate from KDE:45 (but yes, create it "now"). But at some point those aggregates will need to be converted to own copies... and that will mean a full rebuild, with release numbers doing funny things (not a problem with "zypper dup --from K:D:F", but some people will do a "zypper up"). Any way to keep the release numbers higher after the change? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kde+help@opensuse.org