Fredag 8. januar 2010 16.41.19 skrev Daniel Fuhrmann :
Am Friday 08 January 2010 15:14:54 schrieb Dariel Dato-on:
I do like the current repository structure. It seems quite clean and easy to understand for me. Having some easy to enable in YaST makes it dead simple.
Also my point of view
I think what is confusing to me (and what might be frustrating to some people) is the repository structure never seems to remain the same for long. I remember having to change my repository something like three times in order to keep up with the most stable KDE.
I think, this is not an openSuse fault. Every month is an stable KDE4.X.Y release and this hurts openSuse release logic with stable ,....
I think most users want to get their hands on the most recent "stable" KDE release and expect to find this release in the openSUSE repository named "STABLE". Right now this is more or less what they get because of the unusual? decision to place KDE 4.3.4 in that repository. However, I think this approach should be the rule rather than an exception, e.g. when a new "stable" KDE (as in 4.4.x final) arrives from upstream, it should replace 4.3.4 in the openSUSE STABLE repository. I'm not a packager or a developer (I translate openSUSE though), so I guess I'm speaking strictly from a user's point of view. Therefore, it might of course be some serious drawbacks to this approach :-). Olav P. -- openSUSE VERSION = 11.2 Powered by Kernel: 2.6.31.8-0.1-desktop Linux x86_64 16:49 up 4:58, 2 users, load average: 0,71, 0,67, 0,36 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kde+help@opensuse.org