On Friday 30 April 2010, Lubos Lunak wrote:
That is the question. Unstable can be seen as Factory with the latest upstream snapshot, but it can be also seen as the latest upstream snapshot with some more packages added. If it's the sooner, Unstable should be kept with Stable and Factory, if it's the latter and it won't follow Factory closely, then IMO it should be kept separately.
Dirk, Raymond: Which of those two should it be?
When it started, it was supposed to be the Factory packages with latest upstream snapshots. Meanwhile, since Raymond is doing the work almost exclusively without my intervention or help, he redefined the purpose of KKUD to be independent from Factory packaging, just have the latest upstream development available (plus additional packages that he considers fitting into the repo). I am personally not very touched to either of the two options, those who do the work should decide. While I tried to keep packaging (splitting, package names etc) similar to KKFD to make it a drop-in replacement that users can switch to, it has turned out to be a somewhat of a pain, so I'm fine with letting it go and packaging it differently if that is better. Therefore I think leaving out the :Distribution: is a good idea. Greetings, Dirk -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kde+help@opensuse.org