On 04/22/2015 08:13 PM, Raymond Wooninck wrote:
On Wednesday, April 22, 2015 06:29:28 PM yahoo-pier_andreit wrote:
On 04/19/2015 08:48 PM, Raymond Wooninck wrote: I quote stakanov about stability... :-) :-) :-)
And who is talking about instability ?? KDE:Extra contains released software, so I do not see the issue regarding stability.
I'm not an expert but reading this in the first email: "What should you be aware off ? The environment where Frameworks based applications are running inside a KDE4 desktop is untested. Also upstream is only testing how KDE4 based applications are behaving inside a Plasma 5 desktop. Although we are not expecting issues, one can never be sure. If it becomes clear that this is causing an unstable desktop for openSUSE 13.2 users, then we would revert the changes for openSUSE 13.2 and remain there with pure KDE4 applications. " many things are untested so I supposed that untested things can generate instability.. :-) :-)
"I really do not understand why you choose this. This is against all past politics for the stable versions.
Excuse me ?? KDE:Extra contains only stable and released versions. We always followed this guideline and will always do in the future.
very good to know.. :-)
But I can not influence what upstream is going to do. If you use program X, which is now based on kdelibs4 then you consider it stable. Now upstream releases a new version of this program, but it is based on KDE Frameworks. Does this directly mean that the program has become unstable ?? If yes, based on what ? Do you actually know and understand what KDE Frameworks actually stands for ??
no, I don't know, I only know that untested things cannot be considered stable, so, if I consider that both program x and KDE frameworks are untested the risk is higher than if only program x is untested, so may be I prefere to not upgrade to new version where the risk is higher
Raymond
pier :-) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kde+owner@opensuse.org