Tirsdag den 18. maj 2010 16:20:16 skrev Lubos Lunak:
On Tuesday 18 of May 2010, Martin Schlander wrote:
Tirsdag den 18. maj 2010 14:17:02 skrev Raymond Wooninck:
On Tuesday 18 May 2010 11:46:21 Dirk Müller wrote:
When it started, it was supposed to be the Factory packages with latest upstream snapshots. Meanwhile, since Raymond is doing the work almost exclusively without my intervention or help, he redefined the purpose of KKUD to be independent from Factory packaging, just have the latest upstream development available (plus additional packages that he considers fitting into the repo).
I am still trying to keep the Factory structure (meaning spec-files and patches) as much as possible. As you already indicated it would be good to have already the learning for the next KDE release in the KKUD, so that with minor efforts the packages could be transferred to KKFD.
Based on some requests from the community I have tried to have the full KDE functionality available by adding optional packages to the Build Requirements. Also it seems that KDE trunk is getting more and more additional required packages (e.g. grantlee library to build kjots, etc).
I agree with you to take the :Distribution part out of the name.
But then how about replacing "Distribution" with something else. Like "Base" or "Core" or "Main" or whatever. So that we can keep the repos with the basic stuff (stable, factory, unstable) grouped together _and_ separated from the add-on repos (extra, playground, backports).
Isn't the whole point of what's written above _not_ to keep Unstable grouped together with Stable/Factory?
No, I think the point is not to associate Unstable closely with the distribution, which makes some sense. But not grouping repos that contain different flavours of basically the same stuff, does not make sense. That just makes it more confusing and increases the risk of people mixing incompatible repos imo. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kde+help@opensuse.org