On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 20:18, Roger Luedecke <roger.luedecke@...> wrote:
On Monday, July 04, 2011 11:05:37 AM Sven Burmeister wrote:
Am Montag, 4. Juli 2011, 11:17:06 schrieb Anton Aylward:
todd rme said the following on 07/04/2011 11:01 AM: <snip>
OK, so rekonq has addblock built in. WYSIWYG and that's it.
The adblock in rekonq is a url-only blocker, it is in no way as sopicated as "Adblock-Plus" (from Wladimir Palant, not to be confused with the original "Adblock"). Aditionally a dear miss is the (domain) selectiv Javascript/Media blocker like NoScript. <snip>
Exactly. This is why I advocate switching to Rekonq. Many will choose Firefox, but many will also stick with Rekonq which would help speed up development.
The main point to avoid is the continous trouble with the Adobe flash-player in rekonq. You wanna crash rekonq? Go to a video-site. Youtube works some times, but others... The sorry state is, the (open) alternatives to Adobe flash-player are not working with better reliablility in rekonq. On OSS 11.2 with KDE:Release:46 rekonq was simply not feasable for daily mainstay. Yes as a good third browser instead of konqueror, but not even good enough (reliablility) to replace Opera as second choice. (For Me.) My vote is for rekonq instead of konqueror, but not as THE default browser on the Desktop / "text/html"-mimetype. I have hopes for OSS 12.1 with KDE 4.7 / 4.8 for betterment in rekonq esp. wrt plugins (flash/replacement). More rekonq users, esp in KDE 4.7 would give more feedback for the devs. Just my 2 ct, Yamaban. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kde+help@opensuse.org