On Monday 23 Sep 2013 17:56:53 Martin Schlander wrote:
Onsdag den 18. september 2013 10:39:05 skrev Nico Kruber:
On Tuesday 17 Sep 2013 23:56:10 you wrote:
One more topic for the meeting could be what we discussed last time, i.e. which packages (apps vs. KDE libs) go into which repo (KDF/KR411 vs. KDE:Extra). There seems to be quite a mix, e.g. digikam in KR411, skanlite not any more etc.
sorry, I meant KUA, not KDE:Extra
KUA is for packages which *do* exist in KDF (links to KDF, not "real" packages). So a "mix" is expected, in fact if packages exist in KUA, which do not exist in KDF something is wrong.
KUA should not be used with KR4XX, KUA is strictly an add-on repo for people using the stable, officially released, tested KDE packages, but who would like updated versions of non-SC apps like amarok.
This is how I understood it, too, which in turn means that all (stable) packages for applications in KDF should also be in KR4XX. However, there during the creation of KR411 a different policy was used which removed several of these applications, e.g. skanlite, kmymoney from KR411. Nico