On Wednesday August 18 2010 00:24:12 Nico Kruber wrote:
On Tuesday 17 August 2010 23:19:02 Will Stephenson wrote:
On Friday 13 August 2010 07:54:32 Nico Kruber wrote:
On Friday 13 August 2010 03:23:55 Stephan Kleine wrote:
On Friday August 13 2010 00:47:02 Ilya Chernykh wrote:
How do I become a maintainer then / who can add me?
What's your account name and what packages do you want to maintain?
Please simply maintain it currently by filing submit requests. See http://en.opensuse.org/Build_Service/Collaboration for how to do that. Once you proofed you know what your are doing we are more than happy to add you as maintainer for the packages you are interested in.
ok - fine with me
Hi Nico
Stephan Kleine (bitshuffler) has also made a KMyMoney4 package today - I guess he didn't read this thread. Can you have a look at SR 45731 (osc show -d 45731) since you are experienced in building KMyMoney4 and see if there are any improvements which your package and Stephan's can share when it is submitted to KDE:Distro:Factory? He is using the aqbanking and gwenhywar packages from Gnome:Apps IIUC.
that message came just about 2 hours too late as I was re-organising my projects in order to integrate kmymoney4 with the latest stable aqbanking and gwenhywfar libraries and just finished.
btw: seems I was wrong when I said that the new kmymoney didn't work with the old aqbanking and gwenhywfar packages... haven't done functional tests yet though
the osc command you gave me didn't work though (osc 0.128: unknown command: 'show') but I had a look into his home:bitshuffler:branches:KDE:Distro:Factory repository - as far as I can see, he based his package on the old kmymoney package -
I added the old .changes file, the spec was written from scratch since it made more sense IMHO. FWIW, the command is "osc rq show 45731"
the kmymoney4 package that was in KDE:Community however splits off some of its libraries (don't know the preferred method here)
IMHO splitting out those libs makes no sense since they aren't "public" as in don't get used by other stuff.
- his packaging style is however "cleaner" although some of the BuildRequires could receive version information
Thanks. I avoided hard coding any version information since it creates less work on the long run. Feel free to suggest what you don't like.
- we should also decide on the package's name - kmymoney4 or kmymoney (the old kmymoney in KDE:KDE3 needs to be renamed to kde3-kmymoney anyway)
IMHO the name should be plain kmymoney since that is the name of the project and I doubt anyone would install the KDE 3 & 4 one in parallel and KDE 3 is legacy. Also I just had it with those version perfixes. If you think the name should be different then the KDE 3 version should be renamed to kmymoney3.
I'd suggest to mix both packages but functionally both build the kbanking plugin for online banking (as said above though, I haven't tested either yet)
I didn't test online banking either but according to the log it builds just fine and uses the stuff so it _should_ work. regards, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kde+help@opensuse.org