Am Freitag, 9. September 2016, 08:57:51 CEST schrieb Ludwig Nussel:
šumski schrieb:
On Thursday 08 of September 2016 10:35:47 Ludwig Nussel wrote:
Fabian Vogt schrieb:
Am Mittwoch, 7. September 2016, 14:44:33 CEST schrieb Ludwig Nussel:
With Plasma 5.8 coming closer how about submitting towards Factory already? It would stay in staging for a while but we'd get the new stuff exposed to reviews like factory-auto and legal already. That way we probably have a chance for some pre 5.8 for 42.2 Beta2?
I agree that Plasma 5.8 should be submitted as early as possible, but there are not even tars available yet. AFAICS, the earliest date some non-git packages can be made is Sep 15. Even those are beta, so it's not planned for TW. (Staging shouldn't be a problem though). I guess we could submit the beta packages to 42.2 while leaving TW at 5.7.4 for those two weeks.
Sure, but we could have git based packages until actual tarball releases are created, right?
Sure, but we need to adjust all the specs not to search for translations, plus bundle-lang will need adjustments too. openQA-ing krypton does not help?
It is of tremendous help of course. Still, staging and the various automated Factory reviews have the potential to bring up other issues. My naive assumption was that the Krypton iso is based on packages built from git, so I thought it should be straight forward to submit :-) Are Krypton packages different from the packages built from tarballs?
Yes, in various ways: - Some packages have a different name (kmail5.spec -> kmail.spec) - Translations live in a separate repo and thus aren't built - Sometimes different build options if it can optionally build against something not yet released - They are only built with Qt 5.7 (from git as well) It might be a good idea to clean that up and make it at least script-friendly to convert the spec files, but it's not a small undertaking. For Plasma, which lives in KDE:Unstable:Frameworks, the first point shouldn't apply, but it's still not close enough AFAICS. Also, the branding is currently only half-baked, so I haven't submitted that into the repo yet, which means it's identical to upstream. It should be complete (same level as 42.1, so no new graphics) on the weekend though. What could be done (I guess) is to run a script on all Plasma packages, localrun the service temporarily and submit that to 42.2. Would that be ok? I wonder how the users/testers would react to the unreleased-ness of Plasma in the next version... Cheers, Fabian
cu Ludwig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kde+owner@opensuse.org