On Tue, 04 Aug 2020 21:28:55 +0200 Stasiek Michalski wrote:

Hi,

We are currently planning out the migration from mlmmj to mailman 3. We have been discussing moving lists over from opensuse-$list@opensuse.org to $list@lists.opensuse.org (and potentially allowing subprojects to use their own domains), for both collision and aesthetic reasons. We would like to hear your input.

Hi As a nomail subscriber and user of gmane for list messages, this would likely impact the use of this nntp service... Or will there be some sort of linking to point the old to the new? -- Cheers Malcolm °¿° SUSE Knowledge Partner (Linux Counter #276890) Tumbleweed 20200802 | GNOME Shell 3.36.4 | 5.7.11-1-default Intel DQ77MK MB | Xeon E3-1245 V2 X8 @ 3.40 GHz | Intel/Nvidia up 1 day 21:28, 2 users, load average: 0.52, 0.49, 0.39 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: heroes+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: heroes+owner@opensuse.org

On Tue 2020-08-04, Stasiek Michalski wrote:

We are currently planning out the migration from mlmmj to mailman 3. We have been discussing moving lists over from opensuse-$list@opensuse.org to $list@lists.opensuse.org (and potentially allowing subprojects to use their own domains), for both collision and aesthetic reasons. We would like to hear your input.

For the benefit of the doubt, the following is my personal opinion. I applaud shortening the local part of the mail address, i.e., $list instead of $something-$list or $list-$something. I prefer only having opensuse appear once as part of the full address. Having used both @$domain and @lists.$domain in many contexts and projects over the past decade or two, I prefer the former, that is, $list@$domain over $list@lists.$domain. Gerald -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: heroes+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: heroes+owner@opensuse.org

(maybe my previous reply bounced?) On 04/08/2020 21.28, Stasiek Michalski wrote:

Hi,

We are currently planning out the migration from mlmmj to mailman 3. We have been discussing moving lists over from opensuse-$list@opensuse.org to $list@lists.opensuse.org (and potentially allowing subprojects to use their own domains), for both collision and aesthetic reasons. We would like to hear your input.

Thanks in advance, LCP [Stasiek] https://lcp.world

As commented on IRC, I'm looking forward to adjusting procmail :-) (seriously, I'm fine with the idea. If I can help, tell me) Note: instead of migrating test@o.o, create new test@lists.opensuse.org. Destroy the former when all is done. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.1 x86_64 at Telcontar)

Hello, On Tue, 04 Aug 2020, Stasiek Michalski wrote:

We are currently planning out the migration from mlmmj to mailman 3. We have been discussing moving lists over from opensuse-$list@opensuse.org to $list@lists.opensuse.org (and potentially allowing subprojects to use their own domains), for both collision and aesthetic reasons. We would like to hear your input.

Let me quote the former list-owner (with my translation): ==== Wenn diese Liste über Mailman betrieben würde, dann würden wir den ganzen Tag nichts anderes machen als eine Menschenkette zum nächsten Computerladen aufrechtzuerhalten um RAM in einem konstanten fluss in lists.suse.com einzubauen ;) -- suse-linux-owner, ebenda ---- If this list were on mailman, we'd have a chain of people to the next computerstore all day long to ensure a constant flow of RAM to build into lists.suse.com ==== Is mailman 3 different? -dnh, yes, random sig ;) -- Linux is not a desktop OS for people whose VCRs are still flashing "12:00". -- Paul Tomblin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: heroes+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: heroes+owner@opensuse.org

David Haller wrote:

Let me quote the former list-owner (with my translation):

==== Wenn diese Liste über Mailman betrieben würde, dann würden wir den ganzen Tag nichts anderes machen als eine Menschenkette zum nächsten Computerladen aufrechtzuerhalten um RAM in einem konstanten fluss in lists.suse.com einzubauen ;) -- suse-linux-owner, ebenda ---- If this list were on mailman, we'd have a chain of people to the next computerstore all day long to ensure a constant flow of RAM to build into lists.suse.com ====

Is mailman 3 different?

Mailman2 was never that bad, honestly. Projects of comparable sizes to ours have been using it for years - I wrote a list at some point, can't find it though. RAM is also not exactly a major issue anymore. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (22.8°C) Member, openSUSE Heroes -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: heroes+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: heroes+owner@opensuse.org