![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/77cb4da5f72bc176182dcc33f03a18f3.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 16/06/2021 14.38, Michael Ströder wrote:
On 6/16/21 2:07 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
You are confirming what I say, you also think mailman is the one.
Life is a bit more complex.
Even if a message got lost after being accepted by mailman it does not necessarily mean that the mailman devs could do anything about it.
Basically during conditions like full file systems, half-working databases or similar, there is no system integrity at all.
Well, the theory says that mailman should not accept mail under those conditions. Ie, -receive the email, keep the connection open with the sender system -store it on disk, update databases, all that. -failed? tell the sender system that mail was not accepted, internal trouble. -success? tell the sender mail was accepted and close connection. :-) -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 15.2 x86_64 at Telcontar)