There are some caveats, who those you mention are not among them. The wikis as a humongus heap of outdated information tightly interlocked with excellent and up-to-date information, a way too few maintainers to cover all blind spots. This means that the new user has 0 possibility of untangling one from the other, and of finding someone to do that for them. In other words: the wikis should *not* in any way be used as a stable repository of technical and critical information. They should *only* be used to record ongoing activities and short-term information. We with the docs team are working our a** off to provide the community with decent docs ASAP, so if someone sends new users to the thing that needs to be removed because it creates a competing -- no matter how inferior -- "source of truth", or otherwise make it grow even bigger, that person is making our work twice as difficult: not only are we going to have to clean an even bigger mess, but also we will have to change the user's mindset, to make sure they stop considering the wikis as a reliable source of truth. I hope you do understand.