Hi Vincent, On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 12:37 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Let's do it. I'll start on Thursday, and will try to be full-time on it on Friday.
Wonderful; thank you.
I can help with b, c and f (f is just a matter of renaming the package to mutter-moblin and having some conflict between mutter and mutter-moblin).
Ah - well, we have a mutter-moblin package that is the plugin for mutter already ;-) But, I tend to agree that it is a chunk of work reconciling those two, and perhaps one that we can't invest in now. So we need to think of a new name :-) As AJ suggests, these might be more elegant in a new devel project: Moblin:UI (?).
So if I understand things right, Moblin:Factory will be used to provide a "stable" build of Moblin (against 11.2), and all the real factory stuff will live in other projects. Is this right?
That was my plan ;-) perhaps it is the wrong one.
Does that mean that the moblin team will push the fixes that will happen later (and the new packages that might appear) in the other projects too?
Sure, I would hope so. Of course, the need to submit fixes to a plethora of different places is unpleasant; but - presuming we only get fixes into (say) a Factory branch of a Devel project, and M:F itself (where that is based on a 'STABLE' or 11.2 version), perhaps it is do-able. HTH, Michael. -- michael.meeks@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-goblin+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-goblin+help@opensuse.org