[opensuse-gnome] G:C policy update
I'd like to suggest an addition to the G:C policy (less than 24 hours after announcing it as complete) :) I'd like to propose that people packaging in G:C be "required" (not sure how we impose it) to be members of this list. Thoughts? -- James Ogley james@usr-local-bin.org http://usr-local-bin.org GNOME for openSUSE: http://software.opensuse.org/download/GNOME:/ Help end poverty: http://oxfam.org.uk/in -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@opensuse.org
On Fri, 2007-26-10 at 15:47 +0100, James Ogley wrote:
I'd like to suggest an addition to the G:C policy (less than 24 hours after announcing it as complete) :)
I'd like to propose that people packaging in G:C be "required" (not sure how we impose it) to be members of this list.
Thoughts?
I think that most people doing ongoing packaging already are, and I agree that those that aren't should be. No idea how to enforce it either, though. On the other hand, if someone says "here's a cool gnome package, but I won't have time to work on it anymore, take it or leave it", I think we'll probably take it. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@opensuse.org
On the other hand, if someone says "here's a cool gnome package, but I won't have time to work on it anymore, take it or leave it", I think we'll probably take it.
This eventuality is already covered by section 1, criterion 2: "People adding packages to the repository must be committed to the maintenance of that package. In the event that they are subsequently unable to do so, they should either enlist someone to look after their packages or remove them." Seems unlikely that any of us would let a good package die. -- James Ogley james@usr-local-bin.org http://usr-local-bin.org GNOME for openSUSE: http://software.opensuse.org/download/GNOME:/ Help end poverty: http://oxfam.org.uk/in -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@opensuse.org
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 11:42 -0500, Michael Wolf wrote:
On Fri, 2007-26-10 at 15:47 +0100, James Ogley wrote:
I'd like to suggest an addition to the G:C policy (less than 24 hours after announcing it as complete) :)
I'd like to propose that people packaging in G:C be "required" (not sure how we impose it) to be members of this list.
Thoughts?
I think that most people doing ongoing packaging already are, and I agree that those that aren't should be. No idea how to enforce it either, though.
we can "enforce it" by making this list the place for discussion for
adding new packages.
--
Rodrigo Moya
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 15:47 +0100, James Ogley wrote:
I'd like to propose that people packaging in G:C be "required" (not sure how we impose it) to be members of this list.
Makes sense, otherwise it's hard to contact the packager. [We have too many acronyms flying around... that's the GNOME:Community repository of community-contributed packages, for those who don't know.] Federico -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@opensuse.org
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 12:06 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 15:47 +0100, James Ogley wrote:
I'd like to propose that people packaging in G:C be "required" (not sure how we impose it) to be members of this list.
Makes sense, otherwise it's hard to contact the packager.
[We have too many acronyms flying around... that's the GNOME:Community repository of community-contributed packages, for those who don't know.]
Was that my cue to start working on the acronym's page? :-)
Federico
Cheers, Magnus -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@opensuse.org
participants (5)
-
Federico Mena Quintero -
James Ogley -
Magnus Boman -
Michael Wolf -
Rodrigo Moya