[opensuse-gnome] GNOME status (30/04/2009)
Hi, It seems the call for volunteers for mentioning bugs works fine: someone mentioned a bug and it got fixed ;-) More seriously, I'd love to see a bug section in the status mail where we'd have some stats about the current number of bugs, and some information about the new bugs that have been opened. And I need help to do that. G:F === A couple of things worth to mention this week: + the long-standing bundle-lang-gnome build issue on 11.1 (that was also affecting G:S:2.26) got fixed. + ekiga (and ptlib/opal) are now maintained in G:F. I've updated them to the latest upstream version. And I can see right now that opal failed to build on 11.1 ;-) + fate#305318 is now implemented. This means that we should lose a good bunch of rpmlint warnings about gconf schemas files being in /etc. This lead to a few build failures, but I think I fixed all of them. + some minor version updates, bug fixes, package cleanups... Note that next week we will see GNOME 2.27.1, which means quite some packages to update. Are you ready for this? :-) Things are building right now, but I think we have two build issues: + beagle-index: - for Factory, it's still because xorg-x11-Xvnc is not there, but it should come back - for 11.1, we have "nothing provides gtksourceview-lang = 2.4.0 needed by gtksourceview". Not quite sure why this is happening, but it should be fixable. + opal on 11.1, as already mentioned. We need a patch to make the code less ambiguous, apparently. Packages to update: + NetworkManager stack/PulseAudio stack: someone tried to update NM and quickly gave up. I think we really need Tambet and Scott here. + epiphany: I gave it a try, but I stopped because epiphany-extensions will fail to build. So waiting for upstream. + gnome-do: Luis said he'd do it, but no news. + gobby: I invested some time today to look at it. The packages that are in home:FunkyM:branches:GNOME:Factory look mostly good. But I think we might want to keep both gobby 4.x and gobby 4.99, and make them parallel-installable since the new one is still in development, and users need to interoperate with the old one. We can discuss this on IRC. + libgda: blocking on http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580821 + libtasn1: (no change) the new version removes libtasn-config, which could break many things. Maybe we should create libtasn2 instead? + monsoon: Odd-rationale is working on this. G:S:2.26 ======== 2.26.1 is there, thinks look quite good. Stanislav mentioned some bugs: + the keyring daemon is still an issue from time to time. We need help to debug this (stack trace is essential) + 100% CPU with vino. My guess is that this is http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=579355 + ask for password to reboot/shutdown. I have a ConsoleKit update to fix this in home:vuntz:11.1-testing. Can people try it and confirm it fixes the bug? (Note: this is also affecting 11.1 users using G:F) We have some good documentation on how to use G:S:2.26: http://en.opensuse.org/GNOME/2.26 Feel free to edit the page to improve it. We also have a tracker bug for G:S:2.26 bugs: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493750 osc gnome ========= Some changes were done in git to work better with osc 0.117. Quite some discussion occured on how it could help us more to deal with G:S:2.26, and I wrote some plans on how to move to XML for the communication between the client and the server. I'm also thinking about renaming the plugin to osc collab, to make it clear that other teams could use it. What do people think? Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@opensuse.org
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Vincent Untz <vuntz@opensuse.org> wrote:
Hi,
It seems the call for volunteers for mentioning bugs works fine: someone mentioned a bug and it got fixed ;-)
More seriously, I'd love to see a bug section in the status mail where we'd have some stats about the current number of bugs, and some information about the new bugs that have been opened. And I need help to do that.
G:F ===
A couple of things worth to mention this week:
+ the long-standing bundle-lang-gnome build issue on 11.1 (that was also affecting G:S:2.26) got fixed. + ekiga (and ptlib/opal) are now maintained in G:F. I've updated them to the latest upstream version. And I can see right now that opal failed to build on 11.1 ;-) + fate#305318 is now implemented. This means that we should lose a good bunch of rpmlint warnings about gconf schemas files being in /etc. This lead to a few build failures, but I think I fixed all of them. + some minor version updates, bug fixes, package cleanups...
Note that next week we will see GNOME 2.27.1, which means quite some packages to update. Are you ready for this? :-)
Things are building right now, but I think we have two build issues:
+ beagle-index: - for Factory, it's still because xorg-x11-Xvnc is not there, but it should come back - for 11.1, we have "nothing provides gtksourceview-lang = 2.4.0 needed by gtksourceview". Not quite sure why this is happening, but it should be fixable.
+ opal on 11.1, as already mentioned. We need a patch to make the code less ambiguous, apparently.
Packages to update:
+ NetworkManager stack/PulseAudio stack: someone tried to update NM and quickly gave up. I think we really need Tambet and Scott here.
I started on the network manager, but there are tons of changes to the code. Since I didn't write modem-manager I'd feel a lot more comfortable leaving this to Tambet. I'd be will to help out still, but I'd at the very least need to talk/work with Tambet on it. Stephen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@opensuse.org
Le jeudi 30 avril 2009, à 17:48 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Things are building right now, but I think we have two build issues:
+ beagle-index: - for Factory, it's still because xorg-x11-Xvnc is not there, but it should come back - for 11.1, we have "nothing provides gtksourceview-lang = 2.4.0 needed by gtksourceview". Not quite sure why this is happening, but it should be fixable.
Thinking a bit more about beagle-index and 11.1: I think it should be disabled in G:F, and moved to G:B. The thing is that we'll update beagle-index according to the patterns in 11.2, and this will not be adapted for 11.1. (we'll also be able to do some tweaks to the BuildRequires in G:B so that it actually builds) What do people think?
+ opal on 11.1, as already mentioned. We need a patch to make the code less ambiguous, apparently.
(fixed) We also got 4 new build failures, because I removed .la files from atk. They will automatically get fixed as soon as this change is propagated to oS:F. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@opensuse.org
participants (2)
-
Stephen Shaw
-
Vincent Untz