Le jeudi 11 février 2010, à 10:59 -0200, Marco Calistri a écrit :
Vincent Untz ha scritto:
Le jeudi 11 février 2010, à 10:26 -0200, Marco Calistri a écrit :
IMHO1: (without taking away nothing to zypper or Packagekit), the best package-manager I've seen so far, is the one of Ubuntu, it is straightforward and looks very stable and reliable
We're really not talking about package manager here, but about how to install codecs :-) Improving the package manager is another discussion, and it's something we can discuss (I agree we don't have the best user experience there), but let's not mix the two topics.
Sorry Vincent: I am reading the ML at work and I was very in hurry, I didn't paid enough attention to the topic; my sincere apologies!!
That's fine :-) And improving the package manager is definitely something we should work on... [...]
IMHO2 Yast2, without qt support, is very crude; if you plan to remove this library support, then you should think to improve Yast2 interface for Gnome
Can you tell us the issues you see so that people can look at them? :-)
Vincent
This is not matter of issues Vincent, but I remember to have switched to yast2--qt since my very first use of opensuse (if I am not wrong, since openSUSE 10.3) due the fact that yast2--default, has not the same flexibility as qt flavour(IMHHO) :-)
Well, I believe this has changed quite a bit since 10.3 ;-) But seriously, it's hard to improve the gtk+ interface without knowing what's wrong. Can you try to use it again for a bit? Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@opensuse.org